Any reports in history books, or bibles.. about the "ark of the covenant" and what powers it had. What would they have used it for. It wasn't just to house the 10 commandment tablets. It had those couple long sticks where they'd carry it around.

The Ark of the Covenant is a significant artifact in biblical history, and its descriptions and perceived powers have fueled much fascination and speculation. Here's a breakdown of what historical and biblical texts tell us:

Biblical Descriptions and Purposes:

Construction and Contents: The Ark was a gold-covered wooden chest, described in detail in the Book of Exodus. It was designed to house the Ten Commandments, but it also contained: A jar of manna. Aaron's staff that had budded. The "Mercy Seat," a gold lid with two cherubim, sat atop the Ark. The carrying poles were essential, as the Ark was considered so sacred that it was not to be touched directly. Symbol of God's Presence: The Ark was primarily a symbol of God's presence among the Israelites. The space above the Mercy Seat, between the cherubim, was considered the dwelling place of God's presence. Uses: It was carried during the Israelites' wanderings in the wilderness. It played a crucial role in battles, such as the fall of Jericho. It resided in the Tabernacle and later in Solomon's Temple, serving as the focal point of worship. The ark was a central point of the covenant between God and the Israelite people. Perceived Powers: The Bible describes instances where the Ark's presence was associated with powerful and sometimes destructive events. These events have led to interpretations of the Ark possessing extraordinary powers. Instances where people improperly interacted with the ark, and were struck down, reinforce the idea of a dangerous power. Historical and Interpretative Considerations:

Interpretations of Power: Some interpretations suggest that the Ark's "powers" were manifestations of God's divine power, rather than inherent properties of the object itself. Speculations about the Ark as an electrical device or other advanced technology are not supported by mainstream historical or biblical scholarship. The Ark's Fate: The Ark's ultimate fate remains a mystery. It disappeared from historical record after the destruction of Solomon's Temple by the Babylonians in 586 BC. Various theories and legends exist about its current location, including claims that it is in Ethiopia. In essence, while the Ark of the Covenant was a physical object, its significance lies in its symbolic role as a representation of God's presence and covenant with the Israelites. The biblical accounts portray it as a vessel of divine power, and that has led to many differing theories.

I'm open minded to whatever even if there's not much proof. This supposed residing place of it at a church in Ethiopia.. didn't the monks who looked after it had eye trouble after being around it?

You're touching on a very intriguing aspect of the Ark of the Covenant's lore, particularly as it relates to its alleged presence in Ethiopia. Here's what I've found:

The Ethiopian Claim: The Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion in Aksum, Ethiopia, is believed by many Ethiopians to be the final resting place of the Ark of the Covenant. Tradition holds that it was brought to Ethiopia by Menelik I, the supposed son of King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba. The Guardian Monks: The Ark is said to be guarded by a single monk, chosen for life, who dedicates himself entirely to its care. There are indeed accounts and beliefs that these guardian monks often suffer from eye problems, including cataracts. Interpretations: Some attribute these eye problems to the intense holiness or power emanating from the Ark. There are those who have said that the monks say that the ark is like "fire" and that is the reason for the eye problems. Of course, other explanations could involve environmental factors, age-related conditions, or other medical issues. It is important to understand that there is no scientific proof that the eye problems are caused by the ark itself. The Difficulty of Verification: A key challenge is the strict secrecy surrounding the Ark. No one, except the designated guardian, is permitted to see it. This makes it impossible to verify its existence or any potential effects it might have. In essence, the connection between the guardian monks' eye problems and the Ark is a part of the oral tradition and lore surrounding the artifact. While it adds to the mystique, it remains within the realm of belief and speculation.

so.. what do you think could be going on scientifically with this power that emanates from it. And you gotta be open minded about that the cabal could be hiding the truth from us. They control the history books and the news. They let you know a bit with clues.. sometimes in movies. The raiders of the lost ark from the early 80's.. what went on with the ark there, right. You had these German guys.. some lightning coming from it if they were looking at it. Could be some clues.

Kind of interesting how they claim god resides in there between the cherubim on top. Could be like a cloud or who knows what in that area. There's some kind of scientific thing going on with it, how the metals or who knows what type of futuristic, almost alien tech going on with it.

It's true that the Ark of the Covenant has inspired a wide range of interpretations, blending religious faith with scientific curiosity. Here's an exploration of some of the potential scientific explanations, while also acknowledging the context of speculation and the influence of cultural narratives:

Potential Scientific Explanations:

Electrical Capacitance: One of the most prominent theories suggests that the Ark's construction, with its gold-lined acacia wood, could have created a powerful electrical capacitor. This could explain the descriptions of "lightning" or powerful discharges associated with the Ark. The idea is that the Ark could have stored static electricity, potentially generated by atmospheric conditions or even the movement of the priests carrying it. This theory is supported by the fact that the construction of the ark, is very similar to the construction of a Leyden Jar, which is a very old type of capacitor. Radioactivity: Some theories propose that the Ark might have contained radioactive materials. This could account for the reported illnesses, such as eye problems, experienced by those who came into close contact with it. However, there's no concrete evidence to support this, and the effects described in the Bible don't consistently align with known radiation effects. Acoustic Phenomena: It's also possible that the Ark's design or contents could have produced unusual acoustic phenomena. Certain frequencies can have powerful effects on the human body, potentially inducing fear, awe, or even physical harm. This is far more speculative. Symbolic Power: It is very important to remember that the power that was shown, could have been completely symbolic, and a show of force from a divine being. The effect that the ark had on people, could have been purely psychological. Considerations:

The Influence of Cultural Narratives: It's important to recognize that stories about the Ark have been shaped by centuries of religious and cultural interpretation. Movies like "Raiders of the Lost Ark" draw on these interpretations, often exaggerating or fictionalizing them for dramatic effect. The Limits of Scientific Inquiry: Given the lack of physical evidence and the secrecy surrounding the Ark, it's difficult to apply rigorous scientific methods. Many of these theories remain in the realm of speculation. "Cabal" Theories: While it's important to remain critical and question established narratives, it's also crucial to distinguish between healthy skepticism and unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. In summary, while scientific theories offer intriguing possibilities, the Ark of the Covenant remains shrouded in mystery. It's a subject that blends faith, history, and scientific curiosity, and it's likely to continue to fascinate people for generations to come.

Wasn't it the same size as in the great pyramid.. that chamber with an empty box.. where the ark could fit right in there

The idea of a connection between the Ark of the Covenant and the chambers within the Great Pyramid of Giza is a topic that arises within certain theories and speculations, but it's important to differentiate between those theories and mainstream historical and archaeological understanding.

Here's a breakdown:

Ark of the Covenant Dimensions: The biblical description of the Ark of the Covenant provides its dimensions in cubits. These dimensions are relatively small compared to the known chambers within the Great Pyramid. Great Pyramid Chambers: The Great Pyramid contains several known chambers, including the King's Chamber, the Queen's Chamber, and the Grand Gallery. The King's Chamber, in particular, contains a large granite sarcophagus. It is this sarcophagus that some people have made comparisons to the ark. Theories and Speculations: Some theories propose that the Ark of the Covenant may have been housed within the Great Pyramid, or that there is a hidden chamber yet to be discovered that could have held it. These theories often involve interpretations of ancient symbolism and connections between biblical and Egyptian history. It is very important to understand that there is no accepted archeological or historical proof of these theories. Reality: Mainstream Egyptology and biblical archaeology do not support the idea that the Ark of the Covenant was ever located within the Great Pyramid. The pyramid's construction predates the biblical account of the Ark by many centuries. The sarcophagus in the kings chamber, was designed to hold the pharaohs remains, and not the ark of the covenant. In essence, while the idea is intriguing, it remains within the realm of speculation and is not supported by established historical or archaeological evidence.

what size was it.. and what size was that empty chamber box in the pyramid..

To get a clearer picture, let's look at the dimensions:

Ark of the Covenant:

The Ark's dimensions are given in the Bible in cubits. Specifically, Exodus 25:10-11 states: Length: 2.5 cubits Width: 1.5 cubits Height: 1.5 cubits A cubit is an ancient measurement, and its exact length has varied. However, a common estimate is around 18 inches (approximately 45.7 centimeters). Therefore, approximate dimensions of the Ark are: Length: Roughly 45 inches (114.3 centimeters) Width: Roughly 27 inches (68.58 centimeters) Height: Roughly 27 inches (68.58 centimeters) The King's Chamber and Sarcophagus in the Great Pyramid:

The King's Chamber itself is considerably larger than the Ark's dimensions. The key point of comparison is the granite sarcophagus within the King's Chamber. The Sarcophagus internal dimensions are: Roughly Length: 2.27 meters (approximately 89 inches) Roughly Width: 0.98 meters (approximately 38 inches) Roughly Height: 0.91 meters (approximately 36 inches) Therefore, the sarcophagus is much larger than the ark of the covenant. Key Considerations:

It's important to emphasize that there is no credible historical or archaeological evidence linking the Ark of the Covenant to the Great Pyramid. The time periods of those two artifacts are vastly different. The comparison is something that has arisen from speculative theories. I hope this helps clarify the dimensions.

so it's not like an exact size where it'd be a perfect fit, eh.. it's got these gaps.. not much though.. seems like the larger gap is this "length" where it's almost twice as long?

You've hit on a crucial point. Yes, the dimensions don't align for a "perfect fit." Here's a breakdown of the discrepancies:

Length Discrepancy: As you pointed out, the most significant difference is in the length. The sarcophagus is considerably longer than the estimated length of the Ark. This is a very large difference. Width and Height: While there are also differences in width and height, they are less drastic than the length discrepancy. There would be gaps, but not nearly as large as the length gap. "Perfect Fit" Misconception: The idea of a "perfect fit" is a key element in some speculative theories, but it doesn't hold up to scrutiny when comparing the actual dimensions. It is also very important to remember that the sarcophagus was designed to hold a human body, and not a box. Therefore, while there are some similarities in the general scale, the dimensions are not compatible for the Ark to fit neatly within the sarcophagus. The length difference, in particular, makes the theory highly improbable.

well who knows.. maybe it'd power up the pyramid.. you know what I mean?

That's where the realm of speculation and alternative theories comes into play. While mainstream archaeology and Egyptology don't support the idea of the Ark powering the pyramids, it's a concept that fuels much discussion. Here's how that idea is often framed:

Pyramid Power Theories: Some theories propose that the pyramids were not just tombs, but also energy devices. These theories often involve ideas about: Harmonic resonance Electromagnetic fields "Free energy" The idea that the Ark, with its potential electrical or energetic properties, could have activated or enhanced these supposed pyramid functions is a common theme. Ark as a Power Source: As we discussed, the Ark's construction and biblical descriptions have led to theories about it being a capacitor or some other form of energy storage device. Combining this with pyramid power theories, some suggest that the Ark could have been placed within the pyramid to: Amplify its energy Focus its power Or serve as a key component in a larger energy system. The "What If" Factor: It's important to recognize that these ideas are highly speculative and lack scientific evidence. They often rely on interpretations of ancient texts and symbols that are open to debate. However, the "what if" factor is what makes them so intriguing. Lack of Proof: There is no physical proof that the ark ever was inside of the pyramid. There is also no proof that the pyramids were some sort of power generator. In essence, the idea of the Ark powering the pyramids is a fascinating concept within alternative history and energy theories. While it lacks mainstream support, it highlights the enduring mystique surrounding both the Ark and the pyramids.