The Beer–Bouguer–Lambert (BBL) extinction law is an empirical relationship describing the attenuation in intensity of a radiation beam passing through a macroscopically homogenous medium with which it interacts.
This is clear as day. You don't get it?
I wouldn't change tactics. You're stuck thinking you're right and it's never gonna work to learn while you're trying to teach.
The common FE model can easily predict moon phases, just like before Copernicus. You don't need a globe theory to watch and predict the pattern. Even the season cycle is super easy to grasp. You really haven't even tried, have you?
Just give yourself a chance man, look up Eric dubay, try to understand what perspective means and stop believing Flat earth psy ops. No one thinks the earth has an edge, or that the sun should shrink to a dot.
Beer law is physical law. It can't be argumed with. Particles block light. This light shining through a media will have a point that it cannot shine father, because particles have blocked all of the light. The transition between is the gradient of sunrise and sunset.
The sun gets too far away to shine light through the media that is the air we breathe, and that distance is also dependent on the particles, clouds, moisture, CO2, in the sky.
There are so many ways to tell that the theory of the globe is impossible. Sun is just one. You also have the fact that you cannot see or measure curve, when simple tells you the earth curvature is actually quite significant over just a few miles. And we should easily be able to see curve from an airplane. Easily.
The stars are it for me though. That was the most obvious. When I finally realized how they move, it's so simple. All starts go around the north star. That's all. It's never changed.
To me, that is so obviously a major hole in the globe theory. Because with all the orbiting and rolling and spiraling of our solor system, as it and the sun spirals, the north star, a random point I the sky stays perfectly in place.
Why would our random floating rock be able to maintain our rotation axis directly at a single random star? We rotate are around the run every year, but we are also supposedly spiraling in the sun's orbit around the super massive black hole.
The idea of space not being a real thing, with giant stars and massive planets just doesn't work in your mind. You have to actually teach yourself this stuff too, there isn't some source you can trust.
I wouldn't change tactics. You're stuck thinking you're right
I honestly don't care what shape it is, but I don't need to read anymore to know that this is religion to you. I plainly said what would make me change my mind, but there is apparently no evidence that could reach you - which sounds remarkably like a Roman Catholic. Your confession through projection does you no credit though.
The Beer–Bouguer–Lambert (BBL) extinction law is an empirical relationship describing the attenuation in intensity of a radiation beam passing through a macroscopically homogenous medium with which it interacts.
This is clear as day. You don't get it?
I wouldn't change tactics. You're stuck thinking you're right and it's never gonna work to learn while you're trying to teach.
The common FE model can easily predict moon phases, just like before Copernicus. You don't need a globe theory to watch and predict the pattern. Even the season cycle is super easy to grasp. You really haven't even tried, have you?
Just give yourself a chance man, look up Eric dubay, try to understand what perspective means and stop believing Flat earth psy ops. No one thinks the earth has an edge, or that the sun should shrink to a dot.
Beer law is physical law. It can't be argumed with. Particles block light. This light shining through a media will have a point that it cannot shine father, because particles have blocked all of the light. The transition between is the gradient of sunrise and sunset.
The sun gets too far away to shine light through the media that is the air we breathe, and that distance is also dependent on the particles, clouds, moisture, CO2, in the sky.
There are so many ways to tell that the theory of the globe is impossible. Sun is just one. You also have the fact that you cannot see or measure curve, when simple tells you the earth curvature is actually quite significant over just a few miles. And we should easily be able to see curve from an airplane. Easily.
The stars are it for me though. That was the most obvious. When I finally realized how they move, it's so simple. All starts go around the north star. That's all. It's never changed.
To me, that is so obviously a major hole in the globe theory. Because with all the orbiting and rolling and spiraling of our solor system, as it and the sun spirals, the north star, a random point I the sky stays perfectly in place.
Why would our random floating rock be able to maintain our rotation axis directly at a single random star? We rotate are around the run every year, but we are also supposedly spiraling in the sun's orbit around the super massive black hole.
The idea of space not being a real thing, with giant stars and massive planets just doesn't work in your mind. You have to actually teach yourself this stuff too, there isn't some source you can trust.
I honestly don't care what shape it is, but I don't need to read anymore to know that this is religion to you. I plainly said what would make me change my mind, but there is apparently no evidence that could reach you - which sounds remarkably like a Roman Catholic. Your confession through projection does you no credit though.