Choosing in-between good vs evil implies being bound to a conflict...suggested moralism tempts ones FREE will of choice to bind itself by choosing to hold onto a side within a conflict of reason.
will be able to understand
Standing under (understanding) implies ones disabled will.
God isn’t...
If one consents to what another suggest IS, then it will be, because ones free will of choice wills it into ones being.
This is a story for
a) Nature FOR-wards...it doesn't store. Few within nature suggest stories to tempt many to store these stories within mind/memory, while ignoring to be (life) forwarded (inception towards death) by nature.
b) He brew his story to make you/jew fall for it...
God doesn’t have an opposite counterpart
All sets itself apart into each one within aka from whole (all perceivable) into partials (each ones perception) aka an internal division into opposites (action/reaction aka flow/form aka loss/growth etc.).
It's when a partial within whole chooses to hold onto a brand (god) for whole, that natural opposites are being ignored for partials turning against each other over an artificial brand.
God is all of the stories that have ever been told, and much more.
a) All continuously reveals each temporary one...other ones suggest stories to conceal revelation.
b) There cannot be "much more" than ALL...it's ones within all that can be tricked to ignore all (perceivable) for much more (suggested).
the Source of all that exists.
a) All implies impressing source (motion) for each ones expressed being (matter) within.
b) Ex-ist implies ones consent to suggested existential-ism.
c) Being implies EX, hence being (life) moved A CROSS (inception towards death).
Every living being
Each (set apart from one another)...not every (put together). Few suggest every to amass many into ignoring each.
We’re all interacting
a) Interact implies ones reaction within (inter) all action. One cannot act; only re-act. Few suggest actors following directors to distract many from being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death).
b) Action sets reactions apart from one another...few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt many together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc.
God is only within us, and not outside of us
a) All moves in (inception) and out (death) of each one (life).
b) There can be only one aka all for one and one for all aka "ALLONE"
We control our reality
a) Reality implies ones RE-sponse to ALL.
b) Control implies rolled (trol) together (com)...which happens if one (singular) joins we (plural). Few suggesting pluralism thereby gain control over consenting many.
In addition to this
Addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (being one within all)...all based on one.
their own free will.
a) Their (plural) binds one (singular).
b) Free cannot be owned aka taken into possession.
FREE implies within dominance
WILL (want) implies within need
OF implies out of, within and in response to
CHOICE implies within balance
fallen angels
Aka ones angels/angles of perspective while rising (life) within fall (inception towards death).
people often couldn’t tell them apart
Because people (plural) implies an aggregation of person (singular)...holding together makes telling apart harder.
all that matters
One implies matter; all implies motion. Motion generates momentum (inception towards death) for internal separation of matter (life).
Choosing in-between good vs evil implies being bound to a conflict...suggested moralism tempts ones FREE will of choice to bind itself by choosing to hold onto a side within a conflict of reason.
Standing under (understanding) implies ones disabled will.
If one consents to what another suggest IS, then it will be, because ones free will of choice wills it into ones being.
a) Nature FOR-wards...it doesn't store. Few within nature suggest stories to tempt many to store these stories within mind/memory, while ignoring to be (life) forwarded (inception towards death) by nature.
b) He brew his story to make you/jew fall for it...
All sets itself apart into each one within aka from whole (all perceivable) into partials (each ones perception) aka an internal division into opposites (action/reaction aka flow/form aka loss/growth etc.).
It's when a partial within whole chooses to hold onto a brand (god) for whole, that natural opposites are being ignored for partials turning against each other over an artificial brand.
a) All continuously reveals each temporary one...other ones suggest stories to conceal revelation.
b) There cannot be "much more" than ALL...it's ones within all that can be tricked to ignore all (perceivable) for much more (suggested).
a) All implies impressing source (motion) for each ones expressed being (matter) within.
b) Ex-ist implies ones consent to suggested existential-ism.
c) Being implies EX, hence being (life) moved A CROSS (inception towards death).
Each (set apart from one another)...not every (put together). Few suggest every to amass many into ignoring each.
a) Interact implies ones reaction within (inter) all action. One cannot act; only re-act. Few suggest actors following directors to distract many from being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death).
b) Action sets reactions apart from one another...few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt many together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc.
a) All moves in (inception) and out (death) of each one (life).
b) There can be only one aka all for one and one for all aka "ALLONE"
a) Reality implies ones RE-sponse to ALL.
b) Control implies rolled (trol) together (com)...which happens if one (singular) joins we (plural). Few suggesting pluralism thereby gain control over consenting many.
Addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (being one within all)...all based on one.
a) Their (plural) binds one (singular).
b) Free cannot be owned aka taken into possession.
Aka ones angels/angles of perspective while rising (life) within fall (inception towards death).
Because people (plural) implies an aggregation of person (singular)...holding together makes telling apart harder.
One implies matter; all implies motion. Motion generates momentum (inception towards death) for internal separation of matter (life).