Exactly how someone who gets called out for making things up would frame it, whereas I'd say based on reading the article, it's a reasonable conclusion.
You take a fertilized egg and inject your vector plasmid with a super, super tiny needle. The CRISPR-Cas9 system (consisting of Cas9 and the guide RNA) targets the desired piece of DNA and creates a cut. Protein xy encoded by the DNA cannot be produced anymore.
Never post on this website again, paid jewish shill.
They found colon cancer cells with vax rna in it, that it's a cancer cell means it's mutated from a normal cell. That's what cancer is. Further, every time the cells replicated, they did so with the vax mutation (Pfizer plasmids).
It's really a matter of ascribing causality for conclusive proof, which needs more testing. That's how science is supposed to work at least.
aka "making shit up"
Exactly how someone who gets called out for making things up would frame it, whereas I'd say based on reading the article, it's a reasonable conclusion.
Still, I appreciate your role here.
And yet you utterly fail at explaining your reasoning beyond "because I say so".
Learn how to construct an argument.
Nice comeback, but utterly meaningless for the discussion at hand.
Read the article, then come back again with something from it.
Your imbecilic assertion that rna can "mutate" cells is quite enough to recognize that you have no fucking idea what you are talking about.
Good to know you’re objectively wrong about everything you say on every subject, I guess.
Please quote the part of the article that describes how rna "mutates a cell".
Never post on this website again, paid jewish shill.
Pettifoggery
They found colon cancer cells with vax rna in it, that it's a cancer cell means it's mutated from a normal cell. That's what cancer is. Further, every time the cells replicated, they did so with the vax mutation (Pfizer plasmids).
It's really a matter of ascribing causality for conclusive proof, which needs more testing. That's how science is supposed to work at least.