Implication cannot be held onto since it moves, hence implicating the folding within motion (im-plic-ation). Few suggest conservatism (hence the can) to tempt many to ignore being a vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death).
In the beginning there was the word.
a) Only within sound can a word be shaped.
b) Beginning implies be (being) ginnan (to open up) aka inception of being alive, while being moved towards death.
Suggested "in the beginning" inverts perception be (being) within perceivable ginnan (to open up)...
c) THE aka suggested the-ism implies an authority before word...hence sound aka entire aka all aka whole...God. It's ones consent to the suggested word, which authorizes a chosen one to shape words in the name of (in nomine) God.
Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto words, while ignoring perceivable sound.
Sound is vibration
Sound implies entire...vibration implies a setting apart of action and reactions, hence tion generating vibra/weip - "to turn".
Sound was before vibration comes into being.
vibration means energy
Energy vibrates...meaning tempts those vibrating within energy to hold onto something while pretending to be still.
Meaning/mean/men - "to think"...thought can be corrupted by tempting one to ignore that which moves (perceivable inspiration) for that which one holds onto (suggested information).
Life is able to exist because of the word
Suggested "because" inverts cause (sound) towards being (word)...if one consents to it.
Cause enables being...suggested words tempt being to disable ones choice for a chosen ones suggested meaning attached to a word.
Schumann resonances
Suggested Schumann (singular) resonances (plural) tempts one to ignore RE (ones response) SON (all sound)...energy implies all in one.
Consenting to another ones (schumann) suggested pluralism (resonances) establishes dissonance for one (re) within all (sonance).
What's the implication of echo/reflection among differences (waves) within same (sound)?
the reason for life
Life sustains itself through resonance...reason implies dissonance among life.
You gave up your secret there Willy... That is why you are such a word smith eh....etymonline
a) Smith/smi - "to cut"...hence me cutting apart words shaped together within sound setting apart.
The US called those "wars" when it was clearly sticks and stones vs advanced artillery.
a) Ones (singular) consent to suggested US (plural) aka united states establishes the VS aka VERSUS aka WAR.
b) If "sticks and stones may break my bones...but words shall never hurt me" then why can US make any such CALL?
c) Nature advances...artifice tempts those within nature to stagnate, hence few suggesting artillery/articulum/apere to tempt many to attach consent to suggested artifice.
They call it a war
Those responding to the call are establishing the war aka consent establishing conflicts of reason. IT implies suggested theaters of war by few for many to reason against each other within.
Nature neither establishes imbalance, nor does nature call out those living within. Nature generates balance for each ones free will of choice coming into being within.
We were made to love one another
a) Nature generates units by setting whole apart internally, hence setting each one apart from one another.
b) Few suggest pluralism (we the people) to tempt many together (united states aka US).
c) Few suggest moralism (love or hate) to tempt many together within conflicts of reason (love vs hate)....ones consent to either side establishes the conflict against the other. Both love (want) and hate (not want) tempt one to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go.
d) To love one another implies one holding onto another, while ignoring that nature set one apart from one another...adding hate to the mix implies holding onto what one loves, while stuck fighting what one hates.
How does smithers/smith/smi - "to cut" assist burning (mr. burns)? Think stoking aka feeding and stirring up fire...why does one chop wood into smaller pieces? What about using sparks to ignite?
As for words...how does one make sound malleable? How does a suggested LETTER tempt ones consent to LET another shape words? Where is the heat coming from which tempts one to give consent?
And what about the hammer of the smith shaping the malleable heat...how do these shapes cool off? Speech is fluid; right...
Waylon J. Smithers aka WAY (inception towards death) LAND (life) SMI (to cut). And what about the J? Joseph from Hebrew Yoseph - "adds; increases"
How does one let go
By resisting (life) to hold onto what velocity (inception towards death) gives and takes.
The issue....others artificially shape (suggested information) what nature gives and takes (perceivable inspiration) to make it more tempting for one to hold onto it. And it's ones consent given which holds the artificial shape in shape...mentally and physically...as idols/eidos - "likeness; resemblance".
What do you mean by Nature?
Nature implies generator of reacting beings...meaning implies being reacting to each other, while ignoring natural generation.
A meaning is suggested by others, while tempting one to consent to mass consensus aka tempting a different one to seek likeness among other ones...that's idolatry.
Think...nature aka U RE NAT (you are native) which implies ones immigration (momentum) from foreign origin (motion) into native being (matter).
Self discernment cannot be shared since it implies a separation during procession...not a shared consensus among many.
While being in the flesh, we may be apart. But in spirit we are together?
a) Motion generates flesh (matter) within spirit (momentum) by setting apart.
b) Few suggest pluralism (we) and progressivism (together aka towards getting) to tempt consenting many to ignore being separated within origin.
c) May/mæg/magh - "to be able"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/may as suggested by another implies magic aka a spell tricking one to disable self by consenting to another being aka by misusing ones choice to select a chosen one above self.
MAY DAY aka "magic daze" aka a distress signal by one calling for help from others.
Now try to apply this to International Workers' Day on May 1st...
d) Only matter can be a unit (one)...motion (whole oneness) breathes (spirit) momentum which gives matter (flesh) being. So being requires the separation of motion, through momentum and into matter to be apart from one another.
There's no state of togetherness for being other than being holding onto each other, while ignoring being set apart from one another. Motion always takes matter apart...no matter the shape.
Nothing is the opposite of something.
a) IS implies ones suggestion of what WAS perceivable towards another ones consent. One can easily take "something" perceivable and make a suggestion about it, but how does one take "nothing" to make a suggestion about it?
Example..."something like my left hand is the opposite of my right hand". That's perceivable. "If my hands are something, then putting them behind my back makes them nothing, since you can't perceive them". That's suggestion tempting consensual de-nial (nihilo,nothing) of something hidden...hidden by consensual denial.
b) Notice the difference between implication (if/then) and reason (consent vs denial). Balanced opposition (if/then) or imbalanced opposition (consent vs denial)...depending on ones free will of choice.
Aka "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
By free will of choice, you chose to deny self discernment as being within everything for the magical jewish suggestion of coming into being out of nothing aka out of your own denial.
This is how the big bamboozle operates and others trying to get you out of that self inflicted denial are chiseling away at your ignorance, while each jewish mason of free-will utilizes suggested information as bricks and your consent as mortar to keep the wailing wall of ignorance from crumbling.
Implication cannot be held onto since it moves, hence implicating the folding within motion (im-plic-ation). Few suggest conservatism (hence the can) to tempt many to ignore being a vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death).
a) Only within sound can a word be shaped.
b) Beginning implies be (being) ginnan (to open up) aka inception of being alive, while being moved towards death.
Suggested "in the beginning" inverts perception be (being) within perceivable ginnan (to open up)...
c) THE aka suggested the-ism implies an authority before word...hence sound aka entire aka all aka whole...God. It's ones consent to the suggested word, which authorizes a chosen one to shape words in the name of (in nomine) God.
Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto words, while ignoring perceivable sound.
Sound implies entire...vibration implies a setting apart of action and reactions, hence tion generating vibra/weip - "to turn".
Sound was before vibration comes into being.
Energy vibrates...meaning tempts those vibrating within energy to hold onto something while pretending to be still.
Meaning/mean/men - "to think"...thought can be corrupted by tempting one to ignore that which moves (perceivable inspiration) for that which one holds onto (suggested information).
Suggested "because" inverts cause (sound) towards being (word)...if one consents to it.
Cause enables being...suggested words tempt being to disable ones choice for a chosen ones suggested meaning attached to a word.
Suggested Schumann (singular) resonances (plural) tempts one to ignore RE (ones response) SON (all sound)...energy implies all in one.
Consenting to another ones (schumann) suggested pluralism (resonances) establishes dissonance for one (re) within all (sonance).
What's the implication of echo/reflection among differences (waves) within same (sound)?
Life sustains itself through resonance...reason implies dissonance among life.
a) Smith/smi - "to cut"...hence me cutting apart words shaped together within sound setting apart.
Bonus...Mr. Burns (rothschild) assistant? Smithers...
b) Etymology aka etymon (actual/real) + logy (logic aka reasoning about fiction)...that's what I try to cut apart.
Rom aka roam/ramian (wandering about) + aræman (arise)...there can be only one fall (inception towards death) for each one rising (life) within.
Empire implies dominion aka rise (free will of choice) during fall (dominance of balance).
Being implies roaming within empirical....others suggest the fall of the roman empire to distract one from discerning self.
IN (life) VASION (inception towards death)...not retreat; no surrender!
From the perspective of a jew... https://genius.com/Bruce-springsteen-no-surrender-lyrics
As suggested to the gentiles... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcThFswcLB0
a) Ones (singular) consent to suggested US (plural) aka united states establishes the VS aka VERSUS aka WAR.
b) If "sticks and stones may break my bones...but words shall never hurt me" then why can US make any such CALL?
c) Nature advances...artifice tempts those within nature to stagnate, hence few suggesting artillery/articulum/apere to tempt many to attach consent to suggested artifice.
Those responding to the call are establishing the war aka consent establishing conflicts of reason. IT implies suggested theaters of war by few for many to reason against each other within.
Nature neither establishes imbalance, nor does nature call out those living within. Nature generates balance for each ones free will of choice coming into being within.
a) Nature generates units by setting whole apart internally, hence setting each one apart from one another.
b) Few suggest pluralism (we the people) to tempt many together (united states aka US).
c) Few suggest moralism (love or hate) to tempt many together within conflicts of reason (love vs hate)....ones consent to either side establishes the conflict against the other. Both love (want) and hate (not want) tempt one to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go.
d) To love one another implies one holding onto another, while ignoring that nature set one apart from one another...adding hate to the mix implies holding onto what one loves, while stuck fighting what one hates.
What made not/nothing? How could nothing be made?
How does smithers/smith/smi - "to cut" assist burning (mr. burns)? Think stoking aka feeding and stirring up fire...why does one chop wood into smaller pieces? What about using sparks to ignite?
As for words...how does one make sound malleable? How does a suggested LETTER tempt ones consent to LET another shape words? Where is the heat coming from which tempts one to give consent?
And what about the hammer of the smith shaping the malleable heat...how do these shapes cool off? Speech is fluid; right...
Waylon J. Smithers aka WAY (inception towards death) LAND (life) SMI (to cut). And what about the J? Joseph from Hebrew Yoseph - "adds; increases"
By resisting (life) to hold onto what velocity (inception towards death) gives and takes.
The issue....others artificially shape (suggested information) what nature gives and takes (perceivable inspiration) to make it more tempting for one to hold onto it. And it's ones consent given which holds the artificial shape in shape...mentally and physically...as idols/eidos - "likeness; resemblance".
Nature implies generator of reacting beings...meaning implies being reacting to each other, while ignoring natural generation.
A meaning is suggested by others, while tempting one to consent to mass consensus aka tempting a different one to seek likeness among other ones...that's idolatry.
Think...nature aka U RE NAT (you are native) which implies ones immigration (momentum) from foreign origin (motion) into native being (matter).
Self discernment cannot be shared since it implies a separation during procession...not a shared consensus among many.
a) Motion generates flesh (matter) within spirit (momentum) by setting apart.
b) Few suggest pluralism (we) and progressivism (together aka towards getting) to tempt consenting many to ignore being separated within origin.
c) May/mæg/magh - "to be able"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/may as suggested by another implies magic aka a spell tricking one to disable self by consenting to another being aka by misusing ones choice to select a chosen one above self.
MAY DAY aka "magic daze" aka a distress signal by one calling for help from others.
Now try to apply this to International Workers' Day on May 1st...
d) Only matter can be a unit (one)...motion (whole oneness) breathes (spirit) momentum which gives matter (flesh) being. So being requires the separation of motion, through momentum and into matter to be apart from one another.
There's no state of togetherness for being other than being holding onto each other, while ignoring being set apart from one another. Motion always takes matter apart...no matter the shape.
a) IS implies ones suggestion of what WAS perceivable towards another ones consent. One can easily take "something" perceivable and make a suggestion about it, but how does one take "nothing" to make a suggestion about it?
Example..."something like my left hand is the opposite of my right hand". That's perceivable. "If my hands are something, then putting them behind my back makes them nothing, since you can't perceive them". That's suggestion tempting consensual de-nial (nihilo,nothing) of something hidden...hidden by consensual denial.
b) Notice the difference between implication (if/then) and reason (consent vs denial). Balanced opposition (if/then) or imbalanced opposition (consent vs denial)...depending on ones free will of choice.
That's called suggested creationism aka Creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
Aka "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
By free will of choice, you chose to deny self discernment as being within everything for the magical jewish suggestion of coming into being out of nothing aka out of your own denial.
This is how the big bamboozle operates and others trying to get you out of that self inflicted denial are chiseling away at your ignorance, while each jewish mason of free-will utilizes suggested information as bricks and your consent as mortar to keep the wailing wall of ignorance from crumbling.
Alas...back to chiseling...