When we eat we usually destroy the organism (Chaos)
a) All implies ongoing hunger; each one within a temporary organ being consumed; while struggling to sustain self during procession.
b) Suggested organism tempts one to organize aka to put consent and suggested together. Doing that tempts one to ignore that ones perception is the organ, set apart, within all perceivable.
c) Natural order establishes (inception) and destroys (death) chaos (life). Sustaining an establishment (stable mind) while being destroyed...that's chaotic; that's life.
Energy directs forwards...resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) can be directed to turn against each other, when ignoring origin.
Being implies forwarded resistance...others tempt resistance to turn against each other.
for the body (order)
FOR (order) THE (inversion aka suggested the-ism) BODY (chaos)
seeds that survive digestion
Digestion (life) implies procession (inception towards death)...hence inter-course allowing a seed of life to perpetuate self through another as off-spring during procession. Ones free will of choice struggles with planting the seed and tilling the soil...
un eaten
No such thing during ongoing consumption. Hunger doesn't waste food....appetite does.
Temet Nosche - Know Thyself
Nosche/gnosis/gno - "to know" aka to perceive perceivable.
Temet/töm-et - "letting be filled" aka consenting to suggested.
a) Cause moves; effect can choose to de-nial (nihilo; nothing) being moved.
b) Reason (do vs don't) contradicts implication (if/then).
c) Cause does; effects respond to being done aka redo.
will tell you who you are
Others suggest ones free WILL of choice what one wants or not wants to be, which tempts one to ignore that ARE implies being... https://www.etymonline.com/word/are
what does it matter when it's part of the same system
Motion implies same; matter implies different parts within same whole...a suggested system tempts alike consent from different partials, while ignoring same whole.
One joins others to be part of a system...that contradicts being set apart from one another within whole, hence being differentiated (life) during sameness (inception towards death).
forked political system
Being choice within balance implies prodded (press forwards); choosing among suggested choices implies two-prodded (forked) into a conflict of reason against others.
give as illusion of choice
Balance gives choice...taking choices (consenting to suggested) makes given balance illusive to ones choice.
All of our work is for the Creator's Honor
a) Generator (motion) Transformer (momentum) Reactor (matter)...that's how everything generates each thing. Suggested creationism inverts this into "something out of nothing".
b) EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power" aka work internally differentiating employees.
Not "our work"; but each one employed within work + not "all of"; but all forwarding each one aka "all for one and one for all".
c) Suggested honorism tempts one to attach; all perceivable detaches each ones perception from one another. If each one honors all, then each different one responds alike to same.
Instead of giving anything...try being within everything given, while resisting the temptation to take.
we are using
All uses one; one reuses all...other ones suggest pluralism (we) to abuse ones consent.
gave us to live
Giving honor back ignores that giving (inception) and taking (death) happens simultaneously, and needs to be (life) resisted.
King David
David implies a suggested noun aka a brand upon; while King implies an addition (adjective) to a noun.
If nature moves, and few within suggest nouns and adjectives to tempt many to hold onto definitions (definite; to affix), then what about verbs denoting motion?
Hebrew Dawidh - "darling, beloved friend; beloved one" aka holding dear; wanting to befriend; loving vs hating...each contradicting motion.
Check this out... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/davit aka "fishing the anchor"...suggestion fishes for consent; which anchors choice when given. Those suggesting are given consent, which implies Maghen Dawidh (shield of david)...
a) All implies ongoing hunger; each one within a temporary organ being consumed; while struggling to sustain self during procession.
b) Suggested organism tempts one to organize aka to put consent and suggested together. Doing that tempts one to ignore that ones perception is the organ, set apart, within all perceivable.
c) Natural order establishes (inception) and destroys (death) chaos (life). Sustaining an establishment (stable mind) while being destroyed...that's chaotic; that's life.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/The-exploited-chaos-is-my-life-lyrics
Energy directs forwards...resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) can be directed to turn against each other, when ignoring origin.
Being implies forwarded resistance...others tempt resistance to turn against each other.
FOR (order) THE (inversion aka suggested the-ism) BODY (chaos)
Digestion (life) implies procession (inception towards death)...hence inter-course allowing a seed of life to perpetuate self through another as off-spring during procession. Ones free will of choice struggles with planting the seed and tilling the soil...
No such thing during ongoing consumption. Hunger doesn't waste food....appetite does.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/temet + https://venere.it/en/the-meaning-and-history-of-the-name-temet/
a) Cause moves; effect can choose to de-nial (nihilo; nothing) being moved.
b) Reason (do vs don't) contradicts implication (if/then).
c) Cause does; effects respond to being done aka redo.
Others suggest ones free WILL of choice what one wants or not wants to be, which tempts one to ignore that ARE implies being... https://www.etymonline.com/word/are
Motion implies same; matter implies different parts within same whole...a suggested system tempts alike consent from different partials, while ignoring same whole.
One joins others to be part of a system...that contradicts being set apart from one another within whole, hence being differentiated (life) during sameness (inception towards death).
Being choice within balance implies prodded (press forwards); choosing among suggested choices implies two-prodded (forked) into a conflict of reason against others.
Balance gives choice...taking choices (consenting to suggested) makes given balance illusive to ones choice.
a) Generator (motion) Transformer (momentum) Reactor (matter)...that's how everything generates each thing. Suggested creationism inverts this into "something out of nothing".
b) EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power" aka work internally differentiating employees.
Not "our work"; but each one employed within work + not "all of"; but all forwarding each one aka "all for one and one for all".
c) Suggested honorism tempts one to attach; all perceivable detaches each ones perception from one another. If each one honors all, then each different one responds alike to same.
Instead of giving anything...try being within everything given, while resisting the temptation to take.
All uses one; one reuses all...other ones suggest pluralism (we) to abuse ones consent.
Giving honor back ignores that giving (inception) and taking (death) happens simultaneously, and needs to be (life) resisted.
David implies a suggested noun aka a brand upon; while King implies an addition (adjective) to a noun.
If nature moves, and few within suggest nouns and adjectives to tempt many to hold onto definitions (definite; to affix), then what about verbs denoting motion?
Hebrew Dawidh - "darling, beloved friend; beloved one" aka holding dear; wanting to befriend; loving vs hating...each contradicting motion.
Check this out... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/davit aka "fishing the anchor"...suggestion fishes for consent; which anchors choice when given. Those suggesting are given consent, which implies Maghen Dawidh (shield of david)...
Anyway...thanks for the inspiration to write.