How did a plane crash in a field in Pennsylvania knock down a building in New York?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Debris from the North tower once it collapsed landed on WTC-7, resulting in fires breaking out in over 10 floors: the building was evacuated, so there was no casualties, so they just let it burn, before collapsing after burning for 7 hours.
https://ine.uaf.edu/projects/wtc7/
Would love to hear your response to this unbiased 4(?) year study concluding that the official NIST “findings” are not possible and that fire could not have caused the collapse that occurred. Genuinely wondering if this is news to you or if it changes your thoughts.
Unbiased? The study was funded by 9/11 truthers, and the result of the study was announced even before the study started. Even though it spends its time refuting the NIST "findings", there are other ways that a fire could have caused the collapse of the building. Also analyze of the simulation used in the UAF study is found to not be physical responsive, or dynamic, unlike the NIST simulation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVE3YwRgU9k
Digging into this study, and it falls apart.
They literally cut their simulation short when the building begins twisting and showing exterior buckling. Both which were not observed at all in the real life footage
That is because it is a simulation; it is meant to show the fluid dynamics of a steel building catching on fire, in order to understand how WTC-7 collapsed, not to have the simulation match up perfectly to real life footage.