How did a plane crash in a field in Pennsylvania knock down a building in New York?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Unbiased? The study was funded by 9/11 truthers, and the result of the study was announced even before the study started. Even though it spends its time refuting the NIST "findings", there are other ways that a fire could have caused the collapse of the building. Also analyze of the simulation used in the UAF study is found to not be physical responsive, or dynamic, unlike the NIST simulation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVE3YwRgU9k
Digging into this study, and it falls apart.
three things:
you are a faggot . die. all Israelis are scum
" Digging into this study ... " . stupid lying faggot who thinks that Steel fall apart from fire knows nothing about this report and is a stupid faggot who belongs in Israel.
"truthers" - you use truth as an insult. fuck off and die or fuck off back to Israel.
They literally cut their simulation short when the building begins twisting and showing exterior buckling. Both which were not observed at all in the real life footage
That is because it is a simulation; it is meant to show the fluid dynamics of a steel building catching on fire, in order to understand how WTC-7 collapsed, not to have the simulation match up perfectly to real life footage.
you can't find any bias. of course.
instead you lie that the report is of 911 truthers
what a faggot. still, you people do exist ...