How did a plane crash in a field in Pennsylvania knock down a building in New York?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Debris from the North tower once it collapsed landed on WTC-7, resulting in fires breaking out in over 10 floors: the building was evacuated, so there was no casualties, so they just let it burn, before collapsing after burning for 7 hours.
Except no building has ever collapsed due to prolonged fire. Look into how many sky scrapers have burned for hours and hours but stayed standing. It's the laziest excuse ever when the guy who basically gambled on a tragedy occuring that day and won big is on video using controlled demolition terms like 'pull it'
That is because usually once a fire breaks out in a sky scraper, there are people working to put out the fire, or contain the fire. For WTC-7, they just let it burn freely for 7 hours. Also it was on the lower floors the fire burned, making it needing to take less structural damage before the integrity of the steel beams holding it up was compromised.
No.
your stupid false fires can't melt steel. this is your cue to say an incredibly stupid thing like
what kind of strength, you faggot. doesn't matter the building would still stand even if it was on fire. tiny fires in the windows of one floor.
However, and this is the bit that your owners don't want you talking about, one face WTC7 - only - was pouring out dust in Plumes, looking like smoke but we don't know what it was, for hours
https://ine.uaf.edu/projects/wtc7/
Have you read that university of Alaska engineering study that concluded these claims of a fire induced collapse for building 7 was not possible? Should look into that.