When the time comes, they will already have significant percentages of immigrants in the military and police, probably even majorities in urban areas. Tough to say how that will affect the outcome. It will make the government side far more willing to kill Americans, but it could also make gun owners more willing to use theirs.
I know this is used often, but I'm not sure Katrina is a comparable scenario to large-scale gun confiscation. While obviously unconstitutional (as if that matters to them), if you look at what was actually happening, it's not quite what it's generally painted to be. The troops were tasked with essentially maintaining peace in a crime-ridden area that was 95% abandoned, heavily damaged, and difficult to navigate.
That's why they enter buildings guns blazing. And they weren't going around trying to find weapons in your house, they were confiscating weapons if you had them on your person. Still illegal and unconstitutional, but need to accurately report the scale.
What Katrina, the Boston marathon lockdowns, plandemic lockdowns illustrate is the phase one that they have been conditioning us for. It's not going to start with door-to-door gun confiscations, it's going to start with an "emergency" (plandemic, power grid or other cyber attack, riots, food shortages). That will "justify" lockdowns. There will be unrest, and that will "justify" national guard, military and police patrols, checkpoints and other means of enforcement. Unrest will continue and that is what will eventually lead to confiscating weapons.
That's easy to do in urban areas. Not as easy in rural areas. That's why I always say the way out of this is to get as rural as you can, become as self-sustaining as you can, and build local and regional networks of like-minded people for redundancy and safe travel. And DO IT NOW, as it's already close to too late.
Nothing else will work. Thinking you are going to take on the system head-on is not realistic. They will just lock cities down and start drone bombing rural areas. (They can't get everyone, though, not even a majority. They will go after the higher profile targets to send a message.)
When the time comes, they will already have significant percentages of immigrants in the military and police, probably even majorities in urban areas. Tough to say how that will affect the outcome. It will make the government side far more willing to kill Americans, but it could also make gun owners more willing to use theirs.
I know this is used often, but I'm not sure Katrina is a comparable scenario to large-scale gun confiscation. While obviously unconstitutional (as if that matters to them), if you look at what was actually happening, it's not quite what it's generally painted to be. The troops were tasked with essentially maintaining peace in a crime-ridden area that was 95% abandoned, heavily damaged, and difficult to navigate.
That's why they enter buildings guns blazing. And they weren't going around trying to find weapons in your house, they were confiscating weapons if you had them on your person. Still illegal and unconstitutional, but need to accurately report the scale.
What Katrina, the Boston marathon lockdowns, plandemic lockdowns illustrate is the phase one that they have been conditioning us for. It's not going to start with door-to-door gun confiscations, it's going to start with an "emergency" (plandemic, power grid or other cyber attack, riots, food shortages). That will "justify" lockdowns. There will be unrest, and that will "justify" national guard, military and police patrols, checkpoints and other means of enforcement. Unrest will continue and that is what will eventually lead to confiscating weapons.
That's easy to do in urban areas. Not as easy in rural areas. That's why I always say the way out of this is to get as rural as you can, become as self-sustaining as you can, and build local and regional networks of like-minded people for redundancy and safe travel. And DO IT NOW, as it's already close to too late.
Nothing else will work. Thinking you are going to take on the system head-on is not realistic. They will just lock cities down and start drone bombing rural areas. (They can't get everyone, though, not even a majority. They will go after the higher profile targets to send a message.)