why arent u ded?
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
still waiting for all the vaxxed to die. I thought they had 2 years to live
I don't think anybody seriously made that argument.
Here's two prominent voices making such claims:
“I believe they’re going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. Seriously. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation,” said Yeadon. “This will provide the tools to do it and plausible deniability because they’ll create another story about some sort of biological threat and you’ll line up and get your top-up vaccines and, in a few months, or a year or so later you’ll die of some, you know, peculiar explicable syndrome and they won’t be able to associate it with the top up vaccines.”
Until 2011, Michael Yeadon worked as the vice president and chief scientist in a drug discovery research unit at Pfizer. The division he headed focused on allergy and respiratory medical research — not vaccines or infectious disease. At the time of the unit's closure, research focused on developing compounds that targeted asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
video here - https://archive.vn/l0VtP
UCD PROFESSOR DOLORES Cahill Dolores Cahill — until recently was the chair of the Irish Freedom Party — claimed COVID-19 mRNA vaccines will cause widespread deaths in the coming years.
Cahill specifically alleges that “anyone who’s over 70 who gets one of these mRNA vaccines will probably be — sadly die within about two to three years.”
“And I would say anyone who gets the mRNA injection, no matter what age you are, your life expectancy will be reduced to you know die, if you’re in your 30s, within five to 10 years,” continues Cahill.
https://www.thejournal.ie/dolores-cahill-ucd-resigns-irish-freedom-party-5388601-Mar2021/
Thank you for researching those!
The first claim is based on technology that I read about in a science news article many years ago, yet now seems to no longer exist online.
The idea is that a two-part shot can be made where the first shot makes it so that a second shot is deadly. People who did not get shot A will not experience death as a result of shot B.
So the claim was not that people will die in two years. It was speculation that, "...you’ll line up and get your top-up vaccines and, in a few months, or a year or so later you’ll die of some, you know, peculiar explicable syndrome and they won’t be able to associate it with the top up vaccines."
The second claim is that people over 70 who get the shots will "probably...die withing about two to three years." I believe that a large number of people over 70 will die in about two to three years from natural causes.
Part two of the second claim affects the rest of us: that life expectancy will be reduced so that a person in their 30s would die within five or ten years - not two.
Why is it that the experts in the entire news media on the other side of the debate are allowed to be wrong about so much while the most extreme predictions from a very small number of people are intolerable and evidence that millions of people believe weird things?
Here is a prediction from her in 2021.
Anti-vaccination campaigner Dolores Cahill no longer employed by UCD https://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/anti-vaccination-campaigner-dolores-cahill-no-longer-employed-by-ucd-1.4678280
Ironic, wouldn't you say?
It's amusing the negative response I'm getting here, seems people think I am pro vax for remembering what people like Cahill were saying.
People are regressing to the centrist "everyone was over-reacting, except me".
But my point is people were claiming "everybody (or 50%) dead in 2 (or 3 or 5 or 10) years"
And I haven't even got into the 5g graphene nanobots