Since you now seem to have unblocked me, it merely suffices to repeat, 8 times, that my argument began by rejecting dual covenant, "Dual covenant theology wrongly teaches the Old Covenant is salvific"; and then to repeat that you contradict Jesus to say "The law was ... abolished", and your supersessionism is tantamount to teaching a past dual covenant because you imply the Old Testament had some valid "life" and "place" that was "replaced" and "superseded" by the New when you believe "the Old Law died" as if words of God could die forever.
Read this if you want to see Swamp Jew defend Dual Covenant theology:
https://communities.win/c/Christianity/p/17txVyUe1f/the-old-covenant-is-fulfilled-su/c
Since you now seem to have unblocked me, it merely suffices to repeat, 8 times, that my argument began by rejecting dual covenant, "Dual covenant theology wrongly teaches the Old Covenant is salvific"; and then to repeat that you contradict Jesus to say "The law was ... abolished", and your supersessionism is tantamount to teaching a past dual covenant because you imply the Old Testament had some valid "life" and "place" that was "replaced" and "superseded" by the New when you believe "the Old Law died" as if words of God could die forever.