Friend, It's Saturday afternoon and I don't have the time for your entire comment at the moment.
But I will say right off the bat....
Pattern recognition is the last thing I'd trust this board with.... As I'm constantly seeing people reaching to invent patterns that aren't really there.
True insight, just like useful pattern recognition requires at least two components:
Detecting patterns, even in noisy data
and the more difficult part:
Weeding out too noisy, false and misleading patterns from the pool and further developing/solidifying/understanding the remaining patterns.
Any fucking moron can do 1, so can LLMs. The second part is much harder, slower and requires a practised method, not just "I just knew it" -bullshit self-delusion masquerading as useful intuition.
Friend, It's Saturday afternoon and I don't have the time for your entire comment at the moment.
But I will say right off the bat....
Pattern recognition is the last thing I'd trust this board with.... As I'm constantly seeing people reaching to invent patterns that aren't really there.
True insight, just like useful pattern recognition requires at least two components:
and the more difficult part:
Any fucking moron can do 1, so can LLMs. The second part is much harder, slower and requires a practised method, not just "I just knew it" -bullshit self-delusion masquerading as useful intuition.
PAT'TERN, noun - "an original (perceivable reality) or model (suggested fiction) proposed for imitation (perception)"
If all is one in energy; then flow (inception towards death) implies origin generating formed (life) patterns.
The trick is pattern-recognition aka re (response to) cogni (perceivable)...not consenting to suggested.