True insight, just like useful pattern recognition requires at least two components:

1. Detecting patterns, even in noisy data

and the more difficult part:

2. Weeding out too noisy, false and misleading patterns from the pool and further developing/solidifying/understanding the remaining patterns.

Any fucking moron can do 1, so can LLMs. The second part is much harder, slower and requires a practised method, not just "I just knew it" -bullshit self-delusion masquerading as useful intuition.

patterns that aren't really there

PAT'TERN, noun - "an original (perceivable reality) or model (suggested fiction) proposed for imitation (perception)"

If all is one in energy; then flow (inception towards death) implies origin generating formed (life) patterns.

The trick is pattern-recognition aka re (response to) cogni (perceivable)...not consenting to suggested.