Supposing the event was staged, their intent could be to bolster the public's expectation of a Trump victory and nothing more. They don't need to influence an election whose outcome is predetermined, and obviously not by drumming up support through the voter base.
Also, doesn't it seem redundant to stage an event to make Trump's election look legitimate when this was already the case?
They wouldn't want to make Trump's victory look inevitable unless they've decided to install Biden (or someone worse) as a humiliation/demoralization ritual. Their goal is to increase the shock value and internalize the American's role as a defeated people. Not that the particular jewish puppet matters.
That's assuming it was staged. And if it isn't, why is jew-owned Fox pushing the narrative of an inside assassination plot?
Inside job yes, staged no. Ever heard of Theodore Roosevelt? That guy was shot in the chest and kept speaking for over an hour while blood was soaking through his shirt. He knew it hadn't reached his lungs as he wasn't coughing up blood, so he finished his speech before going to the hospital.
The bullet was wedged in a chest muscle having been slowed by his folded sheets of paper his speech was written on and a glasses case. Too dangerous to surgically remove the bullet so it remained in him the rest of his life. If it was today, some people would be claiming he staged it and had a blood capsule under his shirt. (In the event it didn't help him get re-elected).
I also think of Audie Murphy during WW2 when it comes to defying bullets (obviously I'm not comparing Trump to Murphy, just trying to make a point for those who can't believe Trumps actions). Small little fella, very boyish face, typical nerdy type guy who became a minor movie star after the war. He was the most decorated soldier of WW2 and got the Medal of Honour, and personally killed at least 241 enemy soldiers.
Nobody would have thought that little man was a giant of courage inside. Some people see their mission more valuable than their own life and do whatever it takes to get it done and he was seemingly charmed. He once stood on a burning tank, shooting at the Germans and a whole platoon were firing back at him (think there were about 30 of them) and by some miracle barely scratched him. Crazy shit like that does happen, and as any Vet will tell you, you never know how you'll react to bullets coming at you till it happens.
I want to know who told the NY Times photographer to be there, because as many pro photographers have said you don't have shutter speed set that high in broad daylight unless you are expecting to capture something going very very fast, like an exploding headshot with spraying brain matter. Unlike the grainy Zapruder film, this would have played out in glorious 4k, 24/7 to completely humiliate and demoralise half the country. Instead he only got the bullet pic. How disappointing for them all, as it backfired quite spectacularly. In fact everything seems to be backfiring on them.
This ain't the 60's so they'll have a much harder time hiding what they did, especially as most of the Country know how corrupt they all are (unfortunately most are still blind to who's running the show but that may change). Hubris and overconfidence catches up with people in the end, and they ain't Gods even if they think they are.
Interestingly Ken O'Keefe of Europa fame who initially thought it was all 'staged' (and sorry that defies logic and it seems some conspiracists fall into the trap of seeing everything as fake, and ignore things which don't fit) but has now adjusted his perspective to believing it was a real hit after speaking to insiders he respects. He claims they told him 'they' decided to whack him because he said he would stop the war in Ukraine.
Supposing the event was staged, their intent could be to bolster the public's expectation of a Trump victory and nothing more. They don't need to influence an election whose outcome is predetermined, and obviously not by drumming up support through the voter base.
Also, doesn't it seem redundant to stage an event to make Trump's election look legitimate when this was already the case?
They wouldn't want to make Trump's victory look inevitable unless they've decided to install Biden (or someone worse) as a humiliation/demoralization ritual. Their goal is to increase the shock value and internalize the American's role as a defeated people. Not that the particular jewish puppet matters.
That's assuming it was staged. And if it isn't, why is jew-owned Fox pushing the narrative of an inside assassination plot?
Inside job yes, staged no. Ever heard of Theodore Roosevelt? That guy was shot in the chest and kept speaking for over an hour while blood was soaking through his shirt. He knew it hadn't reached his lungs as he wasn't coughing up blood, so he finished his speech before going to the hospital.
The bullet was wedged in a chest muscle having been slowed by his folded sheets of paper his speech was written on and a glasses case. Too dangerous to surgically remove the bullet so it remained in him the rest of his life. If it was today, some people would be claiming he staged it and had a blood capsule under his shirt. (In the event it didn't help him get re-elected).
I also think of Audie Murphy during WW2 when it comes to defying bullets (obviously I'm not comparing Trump to Murphy, just trying to make a point for those who can't believe Trumps actions). Small little fella, very boyish face, typical nerdy type guy who became a minor movie star after the war. He was the most decorated soldier of WW2 and got the Medal of Honour, and personally killed at least 241 enemy soldiers.
Nobody would have thought that little man was a giant of courage inside. Some people see their mission more valuable than their own life and do whatever it takes to get it done and he was seemingly charmed. He once stood on a burning tank, shooting at the Germans and a whole platoon were firing back at him (think there were about 30 of them) and by some miracle barely scratched him. Crazy shit like that does happen, and as any Vet will tell you, you never know how you'll react to bullets coming at you till it happens.
I want to know who told the NY Times photographer to be there, because as many pro photographers have said you don't have shutter speed set that high in broad daylight unless you are expecting to capture something going very very fast, like an exploding headshot with spraying brain matter. Unlike the grainy Zapruder film, this would have played out in glorious 4k, 24/7 to completely humiliate and demoralise half the country. Instead he only got the bullet pic. How disappointing for them all, as it backfired quite spectacularly. In fact everything seems to be backfiring on them.
This ain't the 60's so they'll have a much harder time hiding what they did, especially as most of the Country know how corrupt they all are (unfortunately most are still blind to who's running the show but that may change). Hubris and overconfidence catches up with people in the end, and they ain't Gods even if they think they are.
Interestingly Ken O'Keefe of Europa fame who initially thought it was all 'staged' (and sorry that defies logic and it seems some conspiracists fall into the trap of seeing everything as fake, and ignore things which don't fit) but has now adjusted his perspective to believing it was a real hit after speaking to insiders he respects. He claims they told him 'they' decided to whack him because he said he would stop the war in Ukraine.