I’ve been sporadically watching livestreamed parts of The RNC convention…
…the only way to describe it is a surrealist shitshow.
Reactions/words that come to mind are:
pantheist cult metamodern post-postmodern Bizarre/Bazaar Humiliation Ritual
Difficult to watch.
The vibe: a highschool graduation ceremony taking place in a funeral home on a distant exoplanet in an undefined time.
Everyone there looks confused.
America officially died tonight. I’m calling it. July 15, 2024. We are now living in post-America. The hand of fate has carved the epitaph.
Hello (Multi-Polar) world.
Tl;dr: Ancient mediaforms (The Colosseum, The stage performance) Boomer mediaforms (television, the radio announcer voice, TV commercials based on the emotion of fear) & Internet Age mediaforms (The livestream, the podcast, the algorithm)
…all coalesced into what can only be described as a polymorphic pastiche of failure.
Tl;drTl;dr: It just didn’t work*
(* as in an art critic saying, “I get what they were going for, but it just didn’t </it>work.”)
Which implies as opposed to regular watching. A jew suggests watching to establish gentiles into a regular whole with sporadic partials standing out. The consenting "regular" whole can then be used to "regulate" the sporadic partials.
What' the issue with watching? It's that it tempts one to "keep watch", hence holding onto what others are showing, while ignoring that what nature offers (perceivable) ones sight (perception) cannot be held onto.
a) -ist (surrealist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (surrealism), which permits another to shape the suggested by free will of choice for a consenting audience, hence the shitshow.
b) Surreal implies in addition (sur) to reality...that's fiction aka ones ignorance of all perceivable for the "addition" of another ones suggestion.
In reality...addition (inception) and subtraction (death) imply within the same motion for each different matter (life) within. An addition cannot add anything (partial) into everything (whole).
Ones consent to suggested surrealism tempts one to ignore reality for endless addition "shown" by few and "watched" by many.
Because watching doesn't differ...it tempts alike reactions. Many focusing on a screen filled by few ignores differentiation for sheep like compliance, order following; NPC behavior; collectivization etc.
Because by mass consent of watchers; their focus fuses together (con-fuse). Few generate con-tent (holding together) to amass the consent of many.
To look implies to lock onto, while ignoring that nature aka natural order aka process of dying implies a continuous release aka a setting free of anything living within.
a) MORPH; noun - "genetic variant of an animal" implies animation (inception towards death) generating variances (life).
b) Poly implies more than one...there can be only one aka one for all and all for one. Being implies partial (one) within whole (oneness).
Reality implies UNI; fiction implies POLY...one can only discern this by self; not through others.
Are you AI or a 21st century schizoid man?
a) "I am whatever you say I am...cause if I wasn't, then why would I say I am?"
b) The foundation of you (phonetic jew) is based on one claiming self as "me; myself or I"; which in return brands everyone else as "you".
A jew tricks gentiles to define each other aka to slap labels onto each other aka to brand each other like cattle. How? By tempting them to consent to any suggested label. Are you... implies such a temptation aiming at the consent of another.
OR, conjunction - "a connective that marks an alternative"...alternation implies action/motion/movement; trying to connect alternation with a mark contradicts that.
Direction (inception towards death) generates alternation (life)...few within tempt many to connect marks by consenting to suggested information, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration alternates through each ones perception.
To be implies within (life) momentum (inception towards death) aka within perceivable moment aka NOW...not before or after. Few suggest "21st Century" to tempt many to ignore now aka to ignore perceivable reality for suggested fiction.
21st Century only exists as a suggested label within a consenting ones mind, and no other life form chooses to hold onto such a label.
Coined by Eugene Bleuler who conspired with Sigismund Schlomo Freud to "conquer psychiatry". Gentiles using it to psychoanalyze each other implies being conquered by a jewish suggestion, while branding each other like cattle.
tl; dr: Does one have the free will of choice to respond differently from one another? If so...voilà ce que tu m’as demandé.