I think this is not bad thing, really. Cash is very tiny part of large corporations and banks turnover, and they easily can drop it. But cash volume is huge in terms of small and medium business. If your nearby supermarked will not accept your cash, you will go to local grocery or farmer. So they will get noticeable increase in sells and income.
To really harm society, they have to prohibit cash at state level, as option for any payment. So the cash, that still depict money even for most retarded progressives, will take down a huge part of confidence in state with itself. As far as I understand, f.e. greenback is not just a banknote of US, but also a huge cultural and society phenomena, deeply submerged into identity of US state and population. So, it will be extremely stupid for them to really destroy that symbol, because they will destroy their state with it.
And if they will not prohibit cash in whole, all that cash will frow to their enemies - small and medium business and private individuals. Today, significant part of cash disappear in supermarkets and banks. Tomorrow, that money will feed and support normal people.
Giving credibility to a process that has been driven entirely on enslaving people is not a good argument. Distance from coherence of value and wealth has been the most poisonous thing in society but great for (((their))) culture.
Giving credibility to a process that has been driven entirely on enslaving people is not a good argument.
Taking in account arrogance and ignorance of those who lead that process, I just suppose that they will fuck up again, as many times before.
Distance from coherence of value and wealth has been the most poisonous thing in society
Very questionable, really. Not all societies have cash in particular and money in whole at the top of list of things that provide coherence of value and wealth.
However, you could be right in case you talk only about American society.
Ayh have been around the world from firsts to thirds and they all have some form of currency in cash or coin for trade -- it is a millennias old practice for the convenience of barter. But it was DEBT that began with promise and disengagement from said physical holdings.. and this has mutated when we were digitized. Cashless is debt slavery.
Ayh have been around the world from firsts to thirds and they all have some form of currency in cash or coin for trade -- it is a millennias old practice for the convenience of barter.
This. Barter is the goal, not the way it done. Today you have numerous ways to ensure barter other than money. Nobody tell about that and this is fascinating. Some form of money was necessary in the past only because there was no other ways to exchange information among barter participants. Today that's not the case.
But it was DEBT that began with promise and disengagement from said physical holdings..
It was the DEBT that kikes exploited and propagandised as one and only way to trade. They lied. You don't need nor debt, nor money to establish trade. You CAN use debt-based money for trade, but that in no way mean that this is the only way to do it.
Cashless is debt slavery.
Only in society where you measure everything in debt.
That is why it is necessary to build society where everything is measured in something completely different.
Problem with money-based trade is not in using or not using cash. Problem is in the money. Because money could be used to make money or could be created. This is the primary cause of every single financial crisis in the history. When you remove money as whole from trade, then there are no financial crisses, because there are no finances.
Try to break out of your cage where you care a lot about form of money elites force you to use. It is their lever in that cage, they will use it on you regardless of money form. They are perfectly able to manipulate any form of money, be it cash, presious metals, bank accounts, crypto, whatever. Because it is all - money.
Cash is not worth any efforts, really. There are endless examples how elites turn cash into meaningless paper at will.
Imagine you defeat all CBDCists and break all crypto. There is bank accounts and cash left. Are you really believe that your wealth will be safe if only bank accounts and cash left? How will it make debt slavery impossible? Debt slavery existed from the moment money was invented. You could become debt slave in society with gold as money pretty easily if those who own most gold (elites) want to with the same ease as with CBDC or whatever.
Also, looks like you are certain they will finally implement CBDC. Wouldn't be wise to think out countermeasures and workarounds for that moment before it happened? It will be interesting to read about that, really. I prepared few ideas, despite I'm more sceptical about their ability to implement CBDC as they want it, so you probably have much more detailed solutions if your are certain they succeed.
I think this is not bad thing, really. Cash is very tiny part of large corporations and banks turnover, and they easily can drop it. But cash volume is huge in terms of small and medium business. If your nearby supermarked will not accept your cash, you will go to local grocery or farmer. So they will get noticeable increase in sells and income.
To really harm society, they have to prohibit cash at state level, as option for any payment. So the cash, that still depict money even for most retarded progressives, will take down a huge part of confidence in state with itself. As far as I understand, f.e. greenback is not just a banknote of US, but also a huge cultural and society phenomena, deeply submerged into identity of US state and population. So, it will be extremely stupid for them to really destroy that symbol, because they will destroy their state with it.
And if they will not prohibit cash in whole, all that cash will frow to their enemies - small and medium business and private individuals. Today, significant part of cash disappear in supermarkets and banks. Tomorrow, that money will feed and support normal people.
Just no.
Giving credibility to a process that has been driven entirely on enslaving people is not a good argument. Distance from coherence of value and wealth has been the most poisonous thing in society but great for (((their))) culture.
Taking in account arrogance and ignorance of those who lead that process, I just suppose that they will fuck up again, as many times before.
Very questionable, really. Not all societies have cash in particular and money in whole at the top of list of things that provide coherence of value and wealth.
However, you could be right in case you talk only about American society.
Ayh have been around the world from firsts to thirds and they all have some form of currency in cash or coin for trade -- it is a millennias old practice for the convenience of barter. But it was DEBT that began with promise and disengagement from said physical holdings.. and this has mutated when we were digitized. Cashless is debt slavery.
This. Barter is the goal, not the way it done. Today you have numerous ways to ensure barter other than money. Nobody tell about that and this is fascinating. Some form of money was necessary in the past only because there was no other ways to exchange information among barter participants. Today that's not the case.
It was the DEBT that kikes exploited and propagandised as one and only way to trade. They lied. You don't need nor debt, nor money to establish trade. You CAN use debt-based money for trade, but that in no way mean that this is the only way to do it.
Only in society where you measure everything in debt.
That is why it is necessary to build society where everything is measured in something completely different.
Problem with money-based trade is not in using or not using cash. Problem is in the money. Because money could be used to make money or could be created. This is the primary cause of every single financial crisis in the history. When you remove money as whole from trade, then there are no financial crisses, because there are no finances.
Try to break out of your cage where you care a lot about form of money elites force you to use. It is their lever in that cage, they will use it on you regardless of money form. They are perfectly able to manipulate any form of money, be it cash, presious metals, bank accounts, crypto, whatever. Because it is all - money.
Cash is not worth any efforts, really. There are endless examples how elites turn cash into meaningless paper at will.
Imagine you defeat all CBDCists and break all crypto. There is bank accounts and cash left. Are you really believe that your wealth will be safe if only bank accounts and cash left? How will it make debt slavery impossible? Debt slavery existed from the moment money was invented. You could become debt slave in society with gold as money pretty easily if those who own most gold (elites) want to with the same ease as with CBDC or whatever.
Also, looks like you are certain they will finally implement CBDC. Wouldn't be wise to think out countermeasures and workarounds for that moment before it happened? It will be interesting to read about that, really. I prepared few ideas, despite I'm more sceptical about their ability to implement CBDC as they want it, so you probably have much more detailed solutions if your are certain they succeed.
Share with the class. :)