Both of which are suggested by another, hence tempting one to ignore "so long as you truly do know God". Knowledge implies perception, not suggestion.
for saying contrarian things
SAY; verb from PIE root sekw - "to follow". Consenting to a suggested saying implies ones consent to follow another, which in return contradicts perceivable.
If one follows perceivable thirst or hunger, then one contradicts being alive, which requires resistance. Notice furthermore that nature doesn't say anything to make one hungry or thirsty, yet it deafens ones senses the longer one ignores to resist.
to simply be different vulgar renditions of the one true religion
Does the one true religion require followers? If so, then why can followers choose to follow vulgar renditions? What empowers choice...following or resisting to follow?
representative of God himself
Doesn't each one re-present aka respond to what is presented by God? How are those within nature not representatives of nature?
Where does this middle-man concept originate from? Why are many voting for representatives among few?
you will feel the love of God wash all over you
Washing (inception towards death) all over you (life)...Love? Hate? A conflict of reason (love vs hate) or simply an implication (if/then)?
what separates the (one perfect) religion of God
a) Religion (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" contradicts separation. Letting go of religion allows one to discern self as partial one (Christ) within whole oneness (God)...without binding self to another.
b) Perfect; noun (Latin perficio) - "to carry to the end" implies motion moving (inception towards death) matter (life).
open to all
What if it's the opposite? All open to each one within?
God’s eyes
If God implies one (singular); then why count eyes (plural)? Where's the plural in the ALL seeing EYE?
samarkand
Samar/shamar - "to keep, watch, preserve" + Kand/kent - "city/center"....center (life) within circumference (inception towards death) cannot be kept...it's about adaptation; not preservation.
Courtesan Procuress: "Are you gentleman satisfied with our service?"
If the Earth is flat, how does the day/night cycle work?
What are stars?
What keeps the sun and moon in the sky?
So, you invoke magic.
If what you claim is true, magic has to exist.
That's what you claim.
I could claim a totally different kind of magic that provides the exact same results.
Both of which are suggested by another, hence tempting one to ignore "so long as you truly do know God". Knowledge implies perception, not suggestion.
SAY; verb from PIE root sekw - "to follow". Consenting to a suggested saying implies ones consent to follow another, which in return contradicts perceivable.
If one follows perceivable thirst or hunger, then one contradicts being alive, which requires resistance. Notice furthermore that nature doesn't say anything to make one hungry or thirsty, yet it deafens ones senses the longer one ignores to resist.
Does the one true religion require followers? If so, then why can followers choose to follow vulgar renditions? What empowers choice...following or resisting to follow?
Doesn't each one re-present aka respond to what is presented by God? How are those within nature not representatives of nature?
Where does this middle-man concept originate from? Why are many voting for representatives among few?
Washing (inception towards death) all over you (life)...Love? Hate? A conflict of reason (love vs hate) or simply an implication (if/then)?
a) Religion (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" contradicts separation. Letting go of religion allows one to discern self as partial one (Christ) within whole oneness (God)...without binding self to another.
b) Perfect; noun (Latin perficio) - "to carry to the end" implies motion moving (inception towards death) matter (life).
What if it's the opposite? All open to each one within?
If God implies one (singular); then why count eyes (plural)? Where's the plural in the ALL seeing EYE?
Samar/shamar - "to keep, watch, preserve" + Kand/kent - "city/center"....center (life) within circumference (inception towards death) cannot be kept...it's about adaptation; not preservation.