As opposed to what system exactly? The medieval peasant owned property and paid less taxes than the moder-day wagecuck even though the lacked basic technology and lived in a much harsher times.
But let's look at history: Is this why the jews were banished from those kingdoms for their usury and as retaliation instigated all major rebellions and revolutions toppling down the monarchies (1640, 1794, 1917, 1939)? But the jews loved that system under which they were persecuted and hate the "free democratic" regime we live under now, where they wield unparalleled power through international banking and control of all industries, having all world powers in their pocket sucking their zionist balls and spewing their insidious propaganda like you do here.
Is this why the jews were banished from those kingdoms for their usury and as retaliation instigated all major rebellions and revolutions toppling down the monarchies (1640, 1794, 1917, 1939)? But the jews loved that system under which they were persecuted and hate the "free democratic" regime we live under now, where they wield unparalleled power through international banking and control of all industries, having all world powers in their pocket sucking their zionist balls and spewing their insidious propaganda like you do here.
You know the Vatican runs Europe after the collapse of Rome and the Jews run Vatican right? It's not the Jews that are in power that get persecuted. It's just dog bites dog at that point.
You know the Vatican runs Europe after the collapse of Rome and the Jews run Vatican right?
The Vatican is infiltrated by jews and freemasons, that's correct. But was that always the case? take England: the jews were persecuted and banished until they recruited the protestant revolutionary Oliver Cromwell to help them get rid of Charles I and the monarchy, which he did and in return the first thing his parliamentary republic did is let the jews back into England and a few years later we got the first central bank - Bank of England (jews were banished a few centuries before that by Edward I I believe, on account of consolidating too much power through their international usury and espionage network).
And how is that an argument against Christianity? That's like saying: "our government is infiltrated and ran by the jews therefore all government bad". Good things get corrupted and that's what happened to Christianity in the West with the schism and later with the (jewish) Reformation. It's so bad right now, that people in the west hardly know about the one true apostolic Church that remains unchanged for 2000 years and remains critical of the satanic establishment and the zionists (although it's also subject to subversion and infiltration).
The Vatican is infiltrated by jews and freemasons, that's correct. But was that always the case? Because jews were persecuted and banished from England for example, until the jews recruited the revolutionary Oliver Cromwell to help them get rid of Charles I and the monarchy, which he did and in return the first thing his parliamentary republic did is let the jews back into England and a few years later we got the first central bank - Bank of England (jews were banished a few centuries before that by Edward I I believe).
It didn't get infiltrated, it is the incarnation of the Jewish System prior to the Freemasons. There is a reason why you almost can't find anything pertaining the era between the fall of Rome and the Medival era whatever little there is painted the Catholics in a positive light.
This makes no sense and you're just not familiar with the history of that period. The fall of Rome merged into the rise of the second Rome, Byzantium, under Constantine which was the first Christian empire and the longest lasting empire in history. It was the preeminent cultural center of the world at its height until the Ottomans conquered it in 15c. The Vatican was part of the empire and became a papal state in the 8c.
As opposed to what system exactly? The medieval peasant owned property and paid less taxes than the moder-day wagecuck even though the lacked basic technology and lived in a much harsher times.
But let's look at history: Is this why the jews were banished from those kingdoms for their usury and as retaliation instigated all major rebellions and revolutions toppling down the monarchies (1640, 1794, 1917, 1939)? But the jews loved that system under which they were persecuted and hate the "free democratic" regime we live under now, where they wield unparalleled power through international banking and control of all industries, having all world powers in their pocket sucking their zionist balls and spewing their insidious propaganda like you do here.
History and geopolitics is not your forte.
You know the Vatican runs Europe after the collapse of Rome and the Jews run Vatican right? It's not the Jews that are in power that get persecuted. It's just dog bites dog at that point.
The Vatican is infiltrated by jews and freemasons, that's correct. But was that always the case? take England: the jews were persecuted and banished until they recruited the protestant revolutionary Oliver Cromwell to help them get rid of Charles I and the monarchy, which he did and in return the first thing his parliamentary republic did is let the jews back into England and a few years later we got the first central bank - Bank of England (jews were banished a few centuries before that by Edward I I believe, on account of consolidating too much power through their international usury and espionage network).
And how is that an argument against Christianity? That's like saying: "our government is infiltrated and ran by the jews therefore all government bad". Good things get corrupted and that's what happened to Christianity in the West with the schism and later with the (jewish) Reformation. It's so bad right now, that people in the west hardly know about the one true apostolic Church that remains unchanged for 2000 years and remains critical of the satanic establishment and the zionists (although it's also subject to subversion and infiltration).
It didn't get infiltrated, it is the incarnation of the Jewish System prior to the Freemasons. There is a reason why you almost can't find anything pertaining the era between the fall of Rome and the Medival era whatever little there is painted the Catholics in a positive light.
The Jews write history.
This makes no sense and you're just not familiar with the history of that period. The fall of Rome merged into the rise of the second Rome, Byzantium, under Constantine which was the first Christian empire and the longest lasting empire in history. It was the preeminent cultural center of the world at its height until the Ottomans conquered it in 15c. The Vatican was part of the empire and became a papal state in the 8c.