No virus.

The problem is the artificial perception of bacteria versus protein mutations -- and what happens when you get an infection in general.

Did you know that one of the theories on where viruses come from is a mutation from bacteria. Another errant issue with virus origins is that the first "virus" discovered was on the tobacco plant, which was so large that it was first labeled a bacteriophage bcz the bacteria was the isolation. This was right before Rockefeller then went full pharma and they assigned what ever they could to diseases while in the real world diseases declines from simply washing your hands and flushing a toilet bcz that is how bacteria NOT viruses spread.

Thing is that no one discusses how bacteria mutate, positive or negative. And what happens to bacteria during in infection or co-infection or in an auto-immunological ailed host. AIDS was a great example of what happens when you create a situation (drug abuse) that causes elevated bacterial and protein mutations -- which then get labeled some thing else (HIV).

Then there is fungus and cancer (cellular decay) and...

Ayh just don't buy the viral model as this molecular agenda to infect cells with this complex sequence in such a broad array of hosts that it can be transmitted so easily over the millions of years of diverse life in such a symmetrical manner. And then bear in mind it does it with the supposed intent to not kill the host so as to spread further or even "hide" in the host "until later". They had "HIV" timed down to specific years before causing further infection bcz that makes sense GTFO

That is aside from the obvious "spread" lies like in CoHoax where the whole world was "infected" in 3 months -- which shd have put it down as the most virulent thing ever ever -- but we know it was the tests.

Any who -- ayh need more proof but my analysis is bacteria and protein mutations and jewish profiteering. :)