TL;DR: Jim Jones was really Jim Parker and a member of a very high-level spook family, but this genealogy has been almost entirely erased. The reason for this obfuscation bears a strange echo to the Queen, who was a Parker by marriage.

(I can’t resist saying it here, but you can’t imagine what I’ve found out lately about the Parker family and where it all leads. What you’ll read here is very minor in the big scheme, but stay with the story. We need to be complete.)

This is another long, boring post, but there’s a meta-point to be made. For all the attention that has been given to Jonestown over the decades, by both conventional researchers and conspiracy theorists, how is it remotely possible that you’re going to read anything novel here, things not exposed elsewhere? I’ve looked at numerous such sources over the years and never saw this material before.

You can come to your own conclusions, but as for me it inevitably adds up to this: conventional research is full of disinformation agents and diversion (which I think we all knew) but conspiracy research is also full of disinformation agents and diversion. And yes, I’m talking about most or all of your personal favorite conspiracy outlets.

If you’re feeling yourself getting defensive about this, you’re already in waters way over your head. Think about it for a minute: do you really think TPTB would infiltrate and subvert all conventional media, but somehow it never crossed their minds to infiltrate and subvert alternative media? Seems retarded to even suggest it. If you feel you never saw it coming, yeah, that’s how it supposed to work.

Anyway, on to the subject at hand, Jim Parker and Parkertown. We begin with our gold standard of deep conspiracy/deep disinformation, Miles Mathis:

San Francisco and Jonestown (1/9/2019 21-page PDF)

Mathis takes us a long way, we just need to be alert to when we’re being pushed off a cliff. As to Jones’ background, he writes:

Well, the first red flag hits hard, when we find his mother was a Putnam. We could quit on just that. Without further research, that tells us this entire event was a fake. Why? Because these are the Boston Brahmin Putnams who go back to Salem, of course. The Putnam family came over from England in about 1600, with John Putnam being the first over. His wife was. . . are you ready? . . . Priscilla Gould. Jewish.

Okay, there was the cliff. We did not have to stay alert for long. But was the Putnam family not rich and powerful, as he says? Certainly, but I’ll put it in the true context later. Did he not marry a Jewess? Who cares, no importante. That’s how a lot of disinfo works: you’re handed truth but not the whole truth, or truth which is tasty but not relevant or important. Off you run like a fat kid who robbed a candy store.

Here’s something else not really relevant or important: what actually happened at the massacre? Personally, I think the visit by the Congressman was unwelcome and unexpected, so they whacked him. That, in turn, forced them to activate their “exit strategy” of this Flav-R-Ade psyop. In true CIA style, they shot some number of people who were “not on the list”, staged the “massacre”, and cleared out of Dodge. So, basically a “hoax+”. A fun detail from after the Mathis paper is where they signed their work:

HOW MANY PEOPLE SURVIVED THE JONESTOWN MASSACRE? (Grunge 3/18/2020)

33 people made it out alive

Hilarious! Interestingly, you can compare that number with the scholarly info given here:

How many people survived November 18? (San Diego State University: Alternative Considerations of Jonestown & Peoples Temple)

They detail the number as 36. So the observation here is about numerology and gematria and all that jazz. See how a few years ago they just stuck “33” into the historical record? There’s no occult synchro-mysticism at work or any of that other garbage. Believe in all that if you like, but what we see here and many other places is just buttholes playing their stupid games.

Okay, if that “fat kid” comment felt personally insulting, well, I did exactly the same thing. But then I came back to take a closer look at that candy store. The only credit I give myself here is that I knew Mathis had connected Jones to the Putnam family, and being a little more skilled than when I first read his paper, I wanted to see if I myself could trace at least a bit of that genealogy. For practice, really. I did not doubt what he said.

It began innocently enough with his mother, Lynetta Jones (Putnam), then I clicked on her father, which is where she got her name, Jesse Putnam (born 1880). That’s where it all very unexpectedly blew up in my face.

First, in tracing the name for the paternal line, no father is given for Jesse. Second, and worse, is that his mother is given as Cora Putnam (born 1851). There’s almost nothing there: no mother, no father, no maiden name. She was born in the 19th Century so she wasn’t someone’s waifu. A mystery is afoot!

In typical fashion, I thrashed all around trying to figure out just WTF was going on. I came across this, which is inscribed on his mother’s gravestone:

“Everyone in the World is my Friend”

Seems like a nice lady, right? In particular, she doesn’t seem like someone who spawned either one of history’s great psychos or a CIA asset. Then I stumbled across something crucial, and almost lost to history. The clue is only to be found in a book from 2019. What little I read of it was horseshit, of course. It’s behind a login wall but don’t worry, there are only a couple of important sentences in it:

“I Have to Be All Things to All People”: Jim Jones, Nurture Failure, and Apocalypticism (New Trends in Psychobiograhy 8/7/2019)

Lynetta's tendency to idealize is further evinced in her partly invented narrative about her grandfather Lewis Parker, who for her was a noble soul who used his wealth to ease the burdens of the poor in southern Indiana. Indeed, Jim Jones' mother taught her raven-haired boy that he was a great, world-changing soul, a reborn Lewis Parker.

Parker? Well, I know that name and I hope readers of my other posts do too. This was real pay dirt so I scrubbed all around Geni looking for a Parker connected to Jim Jones. I’ll save you the trouble but you already know what I failed to find. The mystery deepens. Has there been some sort of terrible mistake? No. I tripped across this:

REV. JIM JONES GENEALOGY, 1980-1982 (2/7/1994 3-page PDF)

It’s an inventory of boxes of paper records from a time when someone apparently tried to research Jim’s genealogy to see if mass homicidal behavior ran in the family or something. I’m not going to Indiana to see what’s in it or if it exists, but I got enough for now: it specifically mentions the Parker family and Lewis Parker.

So he exists, but where is he? More thrashing about but I cannot find anything about a prominent philanthropist in southern Indiana. Somewhere along the line, I stumble into this guy:

James Lewis Parker (1864-1938)

Do we have the right Parker? Well, our first clue is that he was born in Putnam County, which indeed was named after the Putnam family. But the big hangup is this: James Lewis was only 15 or 16 at the time of Jesse’s birth in 1880. Too young? Not technically, no, but, well, I’ll come back to that.

If you take a look at the FindAGrave for James Lewis Parker, you’ll find this noted:

James was married, secondly, to a woman named Cora, b. about 1888 in Missouri.

I think we have our man! Further, I don’t believe “married”, “secondly”, “1888”, or “Missouri”. FindAGrave also lists his first child as James Parker in 1887, and I don’t believe that either. Everyone is free to disbelieve my conjecture or make up their own soap opera, but I’ll give it to you anyway.

You have to keep in mind that we are dealing with very wealthy, very old families. Specifically, the kind that have domestic servants. I suspect the mysterious Cora was one of those domestic servants, who would have been 28 or 29 when this was going on. James Lewis, then 15 or 16… well, whatever the particular circumstances, you get it.

This is an important point in understanding the Elites: I like to think the baby was born of love, that a nice kid from a terrible family found some solace with a friendly soul. I also think that’s why—generations later—Jim is made to atone for the sins of his great-grandfather by being painted as a legendary psycho-killer. Jim was a Parker and there are dozens of other Parkers scattered through history, none of whom are villains.

Of course, knocking up the help is something which is Just Not Done. I guess they’re not going to just smoke the kid since he’s a Parker and bloodlines are incredibly important for these freaks. James Lewis goes off to live a fairly normal life and give away some of the family money--all record of which has been erased--probably because he was a good person.

Baby Jesse must be raised since—again—he’s really a Parker, so Cora is handed off to a Putnam. Remember how prominent Mathis said the Putnams were? Note the direction here: the Parkers clearly outrank the Putnams. IDK, but maybe that’s why disinformation agent Miles is telling you about Putnams and Jews.

Which brings us to the Queen of England. I told you we’d find an echo with her. Do you remember her real name? Camilla Parker Bowles. You might conclude she’s a Parker, reflecting her aristocratic descent through using her mother’s maiden name as her middle name. Not that simple.

Queen Camilla gets that name from her first husband, Andrew Parker Bowles. This post is already too long, so suffice to say that these Parkers are the Earls of Macclesfield, and that they are the same family that sent emigrants to the colonies in the 17th Century, producing the American Parker Infestation.

Now, I really hate to be crude about it but I need to hammer home a point. In Jim Jones’ genealogy, we see a Parker handing down his sloppy seconds to a Putnam. In the current day, we see a Parker handing down his sloppy seconds to the King of England. I have to say it that way so you start to realize the kind of people we’re dealing with.

Bonus: This post is too long, so I won’t include the links (use it for research practice!), but there’s another item I never hear mentioned about Jonestown. In fact, I’ll just give you a couple of quotes from two different sources to look up:

George Phillip Blakey, a pivotal figure in the forming of the Jonestown community, placed a $650,000 down-payment on the land in 1973. It was Blakey, more than anyone, who was eventually responsible for the People’s Temple relocating to Guyana, far from the scrutiny of the US Authorities.

[George Robert] Blakey was Chief Counsel and Staff Director to the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations from 1977 to 1979, which investigated the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. under the direction of Louis Stokes. Blakey also helped Stokes draft the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. He and Richard Billings, the editor of the final report of the committee, would later write two books about the assassination.

Double-Bonus if you read this far: It gets deeper and darker with these Parkers. A few years ago, I listened to an episode of “The Higherside Chats” with a firsthand account of Satanic Ritual Abuse from a member of a family of generational Satanists. It was hair-raising.

By this point, I’ve listened to interviews with and read the work of—who knows?—ten thousand liars and disinfo agents. They give themselves away pretty quickly. In that THC interview, he didn’t offer any corroborating evidence, but I could not find a single logical flaw in his story. It was more disturbing than any other such testimony to which I give any credence. The other day I happened to recall the interviewee’s name: Jay Parker.

Does anyone want to tell me it’s a coincidence?