Faking Cleomedes' 1AD books about Eratosthenes' 200BC fake books and Posidonius fake books and Bowen and Todd’s translations of Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy is all just part of it.
It certainly must be worth a lot to fake 2000 years of science, including creating fake explanations of experiments I could do myself.
What is this "science" of 2000 years, you have no clue, just parroting non-sense.
No need to fake 2000 years just tell you it was 2000 years in a modern text book and you will just believe anything. You will never go and test it for yourself to find you it is pseudoscience stupidity.
oh, I see. 5 minutes of insulting me.
Faking Cleomedes' 1AD books about Eratosthenes' 200BC fake books and Posidonius fake books and Bowen and Todd’s translations of Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy is all just part of it.
It certainly must be worth a lot to fake 2000 years of science, including creating fake explanations of experiments I could do myself.
What is this "science" of 2000 years, you have no clue, just parroting non-sense.
No need to fake 2000 years just tell you it was 2000 years in a modern text book and you will just believe anything. You will never go and test it for yourself to find you it is pseudoscience stupidity.
Whereas you have tried to replicate it all and found it false.
I have examined the methodology used and it does not qualify as science. It's fraud.
You are asserting trigonometry is fraud?