InfoWars THE ZIONIST NAZI CONNECTION AND THE CREATION OF ISRAEL
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
I'm not used to infowars covering jewry or zionism so i thought their version of WWII history was interesting.
What points do you think Greg Reese gets right or wrong in this 7 min clip?
He suggests that Hitler might be related to Rothschild.
He also claims that Hitler / Germany received loans in 1932 from Rothschild banks in Britain.
I think we can consider as a matter of fact that Alex Jones is disinfo so why would he promote this?
I might be wrong on this and need further research but I think these are lies meant to demoralize. The last bulwark of the Jew is to promote that whoever tried fighting them is Jewish or working for them. They must maintain the facade of invincibility.
Hitler wasn't Jewish or faggot or whatnot. Evidence to that is scant. But this idea is meant to demoralize and make Jews appear god-like. Maybe he was duped/miscalculated or let loose to make war but the idea that he was Jewish is too simplistic and indeed way off the mark.
To back up the claim they would have to show evidence that Hitler was utilizing foreign money or international financing to import machinery or weapons into Germany.
The allegation that his father is bastard child of a jew employer is sketchy claim.
A lot of the "facts" and resources they draw upon are indeed sketchy. For example , one supposed book for someone or a group I think called Sydney Warburg is considered to be the hallmark of evidence that Hitler was working with them. Yet that book is hardly a credible source. These matters do indeed require immense research to verify since we are 80 years after the events yet it just seems to me someone here and there watches a video then repeats to everyone as fact.
And even if there is proof of funding, is it complete proof of treason? Maybe a lot more was going on than on the surface, trying to buy them off or indeed funding the national socialists for war. YET it doesn't mean complete treason.
And even that claim about him being a bastard child does not equate with treason.
I personally think they helped or at least let him take power, but that post 1941 it was all gloves off and the Germans fought for their lives. Had there been less treason from figures like Wilhelm Canaris and less idiocy from Mussolini perhaps we would have lived in a different world (I got a lot of details from a Mexican book called Derrota Mundial by Salvador Borrego.
To think he was Jewish or deliberately trying to destroy the Germans means all those around him and who knew him, figures like Hans-Ulrich Rudel were complete morons which I think is hardly possible.
"If zionism is bad it is only because of evil hitler and the nazis!" - Alex JoneStein
I never liked that Alex Jones always utilized "hitler" or "nazi" with negative connotation the same way dumb democrats do. Hitler BOOGIE WOOGIE WOOGIE!!! If zionism is bad it must be because of the evil nazis!
When i was trying to learn more about Italy's role in WWII I was left a bit disappointed. Seemed Italy didn't hold up well to the invasion. I've read that the Italians didn't have as much stomach for war at the time and the citizens didn't put up much a fight when the troops had failed to hold up lines.