This is a screen shot of the dictionary.. not even the CDC or FDA etc.. they had the dictionaries change the definition. They had Wikipedia and internet sites change the definition.
But they can't change books you have in posession. And even data on your backup HDD. Nobody can.
That is why they try to force and encourage you rely on some online shit and push shit they completely control, like pedowikia and other crap they pose as a source of knowledge.
It's not that hard to get some good old books. You could even OCR them by yourself if you want to have an trusted electronic copy for fast search and all that stuff around. Today it is pretty simple, you even don't need flatbed scanner for that anymore, any smartphone/camera is fine.
Interesting, that today even educated people don't know how to use books. If you ask some such person to find some term in some textbook or reference book, with high probability you will enjoy an quest of listing through all book in attempt to find what requested. :) Today people even can't imagine that there is always a list of terms and topics on the last pages with references into exact pages in any decent textbook or reference book. They truly believe that hyperlinks and topic lists are something that was invented by Bill Gates or Steve Jobs only recently. :)
Another thing most people seem to not understand, is that "something in internet" is nothing more that just another person computer, and that person have full and unlimited control on what you see and read.
No one can convince me that the timing of "spending billions on anti-misinformation" 6 months before GPT goes consumer was not a long coordinated collaboration.
Narrowing down information to a single window and even convincing you "its on your phone" "its on your computer" while it too is just a firewall to your own data and wider data results online. The real trick was using updated image generation as a distraction from what is happening.
No one can convince me that the timing of "spending billions on anti-misinformation" 6 months before GPT goes consumer was not a long coordinated collaboration.
Good observation to think about. Censoring data by hands of GPT trainers is impossible for such data volumes. So they throw that job to social networks owners to get more or less clean trained model.
If that the case, social networks should had been cleaned not only from usual anti-narrative, but also from some much less noticeable and known things that could heavily ruin model intended results if being interlaced with other training data.
I think they tried to do that, but don't think they was able to do that thoroughly, so first - there should be some unexpected topics banned and censored along with usual non-coronahoax, non-liberal, non-tolerant things, and second - current models could still be harmful for creators.
Good direction to look at, really. What else was wiped out from social networks during censoship campaign?
You are looking in the wrong direction -- why clean the data when you can make it obsolete and timed out.
Ayh have seen digital professionals go from searching and exploring the internet for answers to a problem to asking a single chatbot and accepting the answer.
They are conditioning a population to accept one answer results bcz "its sounds like a human" and you will see more and more chatbot isolation for most applications and searches.
There is no coincidence that mere moments.. MOMENTS after GPT went consumer that all the search engines deployed it.. as if it was in the chamber ready to blow. It was always about turning peasants tunnel vision.
Phones will come with it. Computers are coming with it. Windows 12 will now be 85% chatbot.
This is a screen shot of the dictionary.. not even the CDC or FDA etc.. they had the dictionaries change the definition. They had Wikipedia and internet sites change the definition.
An extraordinary example of reach.
But they can't change books you have in posession. And even data on your backup HDD. Nobody can.
That is why they try to force and encourage you rely on some online shit and push shit they completely control, like pedowikia and other crap they pose as a source of knowledge.
It's not that hard to get some good old books. You could even OCR them by yourself if you want to have an trusted electronic copy for fast search and all that stuff around. Today it is pretty simple, you even don't need flatbed scanner for that anymore, any smartphone/camera is fine.
Interesting, that today even educated people don't know how to use books. If you ask some such person to find some term in some textbook or reference book, with high probability you will enjoy an quest of listing through all book in attempt to find what requested. :) Today people even can't imagine that there is always a list of terms and topics on the last pages with references into exact pages in any decent textbook or reference book. They truly believe that hyperlinks and topic lists are something that was invented by Bill Gates or Steve Jobs only recently. :)
Another thing most people seem to not understand, is that "something in internet" is nothing more that just another person computer, and that person have full and unlimited control on what you see and read.
--> "AI"
No one can convince me that the timing of "spending billions on anti-misinformation" 6 months before GPT goes consumer was not a long coordinated collaboration.
Narrowing down information to a single window and even convincing you "its on your phone" "its on your computer" while it too is just a firewall to your own data and wider data results online. The real trick was using updated image generation as a distraction from what is happening.
Good observation to think about. Censoring data by hands of GPT trainers is impossible for such data volumes. So they throw that job to social networks owners to get more or less clean trained model.
If that the case, social networks should had been cleaned not only from usual anti-narrative, but also from some much less noticeable and known things that could heavily ruin model intended results if being interlaced with other training data.
I think they tried to do that, but don't think they was able to do that thoroughly, so first - there should be some unexpected topics banned and censored along with usual non-coronahoax, non-liberal, non-tolerant things, and second - current models could still be harmful for creators.
Good direction to look at, really. What else was wiped out from social networks during censoship campaign?
You are looking in the wrong direction -- why clean the data when you can make it obsolete and timed out.
Ayh have seen digital professionals go from searching and exploring the internet for answers to a problem to asking a single chatbot and accepting the answer.
They are conditioning a population to accept one answer results bcz "its sounds like a human" and you will see more and more chatbot isolation for most applications and searches.
There is no coincidence that mere moments.. MOMENTS after GPT went consumer that all the search engines deployed it.. as if it was in the chamber ready to blow. It was always about turning peasants tunnel vision.
Phones will come with it. Computers are coming with it. Windows 12 will now be 85% chatbot.