Scientific proof, round earth confirmed
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Come on now. Your posting a comic and claiming its a scientific proof.
Your as bad as the flat earthers. What do I expect from someone who thinks a leaky vaccine is effective, rofl.
You know I wouldnt even be shocked to find out the truth is a mixture of the two. The math proves other dimensions can exist, that we cant see or interact with.
How do we know the world isnt flat? We dont.
I agree, the world is likely a globe and moving through space, there are many experiments and things that show this to be true.
But for all intents and purposes, it does indeed look flat to us.
But this comic is as silly as the "flat curve" picture someone posted the other day, lmao.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVK5SZJicoY&list=PLH2kv7dHfdOe-bJu7Fpijk9LlGyPDE2vY&index=5
These lyrics hitting me like a hammer.
It's a joke bro
Maybe he didn't get it
Notice the "aim" in claim...suggestion aims at consent. If one calls a suggestion a claim; then one consented to the suggested, hence directing aim by becoming target.
Meanwhile; science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception, which doesn't have to be aimed; since it exists within all perceivable.
What if all is one? How could whole be more than one? To mix ones together implies within/during/in response to/transmuted out of all...
a) How does one DI-vide minds/MENS within act-ION? By tempting ones consent to react to another ones suggestion, which establishes a division called "reason".
b) Math/meth/mad/me - "mowing" aka cutting down... https://www.etymonline.com/word/math#etymonline_v_43762
What's the aftermath of claiming oneself as ME? Branding everyone else as YOU (phonetic jew).
c) ma-the-matic aka matter-theism-magic
c) If all implies one, then addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (whole into partials).
Problems (life) within solution (inception towards death)...many are being tricked by few to "solve problems" instead.
a) Knowledge implies each ones perception within all perceivable...suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
b) Try to describe a "we" in nature without ignoring each "one" thereof..
c) You and me implies each one of us...suggested "you" + "me" + "us" tempts ones perception to ignore all perceivable.
a) Intended purpose implies aiming at end...can life perceive its beginning (inception) or end (death)? What does ones (not other ones) inception and death look like?
Meanwhile, life being processed from inception towards death implies a flat-line...which one perceives as moment-um. Now what does momentum look like?
b) Indeed implies in-deed aka life within a transaction from inception towards death...ignoring this for the suggestions by another tempts one in-debt.