So, I will jump through another hoop before you address my points? How fair.
A shape is the perimeter of a thing.
Ok?
So, back to the points. Did you know what the curve is? How much curve should you see from 20 miles up? How far can you see? These are easy to determine with most earth curve online calculators.
Now, assuming you can entertain a conversation without insulting me, can you imagine for a second....
The earth doesn't curve, that would mean, it can't be a ball right?
If you can't even address this, conversation over.
So, balls curve, and if there is not a curve, then it can't be a ball. So, it stands to reason, THAT is the only point that matters because we can measure and determine it factually.
The point about everything having a shape or not is irrelevant. There is no reason why land couldn't stretch forever. No edge. Just infinite land. You don't know where we are. No one does.
I get you think you know because everyone thinks they know. Sadly, people can't consider the possibility of the majority being wrong
Space doesn't have a shape. Your point was everything has a shape. I only pointed out that space is supposed to be ever expanding, so it has an edge, but what is the edge growing over? Another space.
Can you answer why this matters to explaining that the surface of the earth has no measurable curve?
I said land could stretch for Infinity, if there is no curve, how would U know it has a edge?
Either you make a serious and sincere promise that you will at least attempt to comprehend the words I'm writing without changing them to fit your own argument, or I'm not wasting my time here.
Again. My point is that not being able to name the shape of the earth is YOUR wild goose chace and has no bearing on the FACT that no one has ever been able to use a laser to measure the curve of earth.
If the earth curves, it should be obvious and measureable. That's a problem you don't want to address.
All you would say is "ya it is" and then insult me. And you think I'm pointless
So, I will jump through another hoop before you address my points? How fair.
A shape is the perimeter of a thing.
Ok?
So, back to the points. Did you know what the curve is? How much curve should you see from 20 miles up? How far can you see? These are easy to determine with most earth curve online calculators.
Now, assuming you can entertain a conversation without insulting me, can you imagine for a second....
The earth doesn't curve, that would mean, it can't be a ball right? If you can't even address this, conversation over.
So, balls curve, and if there is not a curve, then it can't be a ball. So, it stands to reason, THAT is the only point that matters because we can measure and determine it factually.
The point about everything having a shape or not is irrelevant. There is no reason why land couldn't stretch forever. No edge. Just infinite land. You don't know where we are. No one does.
I get you think you know because everyone thinks they know. Sadly, people can't consider the possibility of the majority being wrong
and empty space has no perimeter....
empty space has no interior and no exterior.... therefore there is no perimeter defining the boundary between the two.
get it now?
what is the shape of the Earth?
You've spent all this time arguing nonsense to avoid the simple fact that you can't even name the shape of the Earth.
and I'm not going to address any more of your points until you do.
Space doesn't have a shape. Your point was everything has a shape. I only pointed out that space is supposed to be ever expanding, so it has an edge, but what is the edge growing over? Another space.
Can you answer why this matters to explaining that the surface of the earth has no measurable curve?
I said land could stretch for Infinity, if there is no curve, how would U know it has a edge?
I never said that at all..
I said "All shapes have edges bud... Every single one... 2D and 3D."....
"all shapes have edges" ≠ "everything is a shape"
Either you make a serious and sincere promise that you will at least attempt to comprehend the words I'm writing without changing them to fit your own argument, or I'm not wasting my time here.
Nah, moving on. Bye
Again. My point is that not being able to name the shape of the earth is YOUR wild goose chace and has no bearing on the FACT that no one has ever been able to use a laser to measure the curve of earth.
If the earth curves, it should be obvious and measureable. That's a problem you don't want to address.
All you would say is "ya it is" and then insult me. And you think I'm pointless