Stanley Kubrick was the best director of all time
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (338)
sorted by:
This conversation is already useless because you dismiss actual proof. You know nothing about how Kubrick worked, or what he studied that influenced how he made movies. It ties into the Charles Lindbergh baby, but you wouldn't know that because you dismiss proof.
Fresh coming from the person who literally refuses to watch 45 seconds proving your "kubrick" video is an actor named Tom.
Looks like a rushed job to discredit it tbh. That still doesn't explain his writing it into The Shining.
Huh? I can tell by your reply that you arent talking about the same thing. Thats why I even queued it up for you so you only have to listen for 45 seconds. Here is the link again:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=yDyJe1nmSOM&t=36m41s
After watching this snippet for only 45 (starts at 36m and 41seconds, no need to watch entirety, although you would benefit from the whole thing) - after watching 45 seconds you will say to yourself "oh shit, I've been had. The actor, named Tom, dressed up as Stanley Kubrick, was directed these lines to make it appear a confession. I wonder who would pay for such a thing. I now question why the documentary I've been spreading online dares omit this inconvenient 45 seconds, or why the maker has not since denounced or retracted the fake confession. Next I should probably look into the Buzz Aldrin interview to see if zippy2 is trying to show me how the documentary is also playing games on that part, too. It is a shame that these 2 spoilers would take away from the rest of the documentary but I must admit it is bizarre they have not detracted, and so now I recognize whats still valid from the last 20 minutes of the film I am spreading online, I am left with only translating intended symbolism. Perhaps I will stick to my thesis, but I will first find more convincing arguments that have not already been proven dishonest, at best, and fraudulent at worst."
Why would they bother unless to discredit the idea? It only strengthens the notion that he actually did it. It looks like desperate damage control.