Stanley Kubrick was the best director of all time
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (338)
sorted by:
Looks like a rushed job to discredit it tbh. That still doesn't explain his writing it into The Shining.
Huh? I can tell by your reply that you arent talking about the same thing. Thats why I even queued it up for you so you only have to listen for 45 seconds. Here is the link again:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=yDyJe1nmSOM&t=36m41s
After watching this snippet for only 45 (starts at 36m and 41seconds, no need to watch entirety, although you would benefit from the whole thing) - after watching 45 seconds you will say to yourself "oh shit, I've been had. The actor, named Tom, dressed up as Stanley Kubrick, was directed these lines to make it appear a confession. I wonder who would pay for such a thing. I now question why the documentary I've been spreading online dares omit this inconvenient 45 seconds, or why the maker has not since denounced or retracted the fake confession. Next I should probably look into the Buzz Aldrin interview to see if zippy2 is trying to show me how the documentary is also playing games on that part, too. It is a shame that these 2 spoilers would take away from the rest of the documentary but I must admit it is bizarre they have not detracted, and so now I recognize whats still valid from the last 20 minutes of the film I am spreading online, I am left with only translating intended symbolism. Perhaps I will stick to my thesis, but I will first find more convincing arguments that have not already been proven dishonest, at best, and fraudulent at worst."
Why would they bother unless to discredit the idea? It only strengthens the notion that he actually did it. It looks like desperate damage control.
What are you actually saying? Are you saying Tom the actor is actually the real Kubrick, who also agreed to pretend he was Tom the actor? Are you saying it's AI? What? You're not even making any sense. Did you click on the link I provided where it was queued up to the producer badgering the look-alike's fake interview? Like, are you a bot? How are you not getting this?
Edit
Holy shit I just realized what your malfunction is. You are 3 inception levels deep in no integrity. Lol. Ok. So, I get it now. You dont understand what I'm talking about because YOU didnt even watch "the last 20 mins or so" of your own linked documentary!! You are a dishonerable piece of shit. If you actually spent the time to see what you were sending out, it features an actor named Tom who pretends he is Kubrick admitting he faked the moon landing. The documentary presents it as if its the real Stanley Kubrick. So, I thought you had actually seen the foottage because you said in another post that "Kubrick admitted it, himself" and I noticed that you were fooled. Wow. Great job you fucking retard. So your response makes sense now. You agree it is suspicious as fuck that this producer is badgering this Tom guy and it looks like a set up. Yes! Exactly. Thats because it is a set up. Jesus fucking Christ. You are the lousiest dipshit, I've ever come across and you aught to go hang yourself.
tl;dr
Lefties are more brief.
The fail in your logic is the fact they had to rush that together. Why would they fake an interview unless to cointelpro the fact that Kubrick filmed the moon landings?