Not that Satan was not ultimately behind it, but everyone should be familiar with just how explicit the New Testament is about the circumstances. From Matthew 27:
Now the chief priests and the elders persuaded the crowd to ask for Barabbas and destroy Jesus.... Pilate said to them, “Then what shall I do with Jesus who is called Christ?” They all said, “Let him be crucified!”... So when Pilate saw that he was gaining nothing, but rather that a riot was beginning, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd, saying, “I am innocent of this man’s blood; see to it yourselves.” And all the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!”
I believe this is especially vital when these kinds of idea is floated, like this one just from today:
Lucifer, Satan, the devil and Abbodan were 4 different demons known as a dragon who did all they could to sabatoge Jesus’ mission which they failed at. Jesus was to introduce the Father as Love while behaving in that way before humanity. He then decided he would allow himself to be captured to prove death isn’t real. All this greatly helped humanity.
Judas was supposed to get an honorary seat at the Sanhedrin but they lied and gave him silver instead. He realized he did all of it for nothing and hanged himself.
Regrettably, based on the extensive original research I have done, I cannot agree that that is what transpired. But everything gets to believe what pleases them and always does so anyway. Best of luck.
But everything gets to believe what pleases them and always does so anyway. Best of luck.
Ancient pagans that practiced blood sacrifice worshiped the devil in form of various different pagan gods, thousands of years before Jesus Christ was even born.
I believe that the devil (Lucifer/Satan/Osiris/Nimrod/Baal) is the fallen demon god of 1000 faces.
I think you're on the right track, but what I would respectfully suggest is that if you keep researching, in a disciplined and thorough way, always challenging your own conclusions, you will arrive at a state where you will feel comfortable dropping the use of the qualifier "I believe".
That is, of course, assuming that would be something you desired to achieve, or even considered an achievement at all. Also note, you would have to be prepared to disagree at some point with every single source you now consider an authority.
So there's meta-point: you can see why few there are which follow such a path.
Not that Satan was not ultimately behind it, but everyone should be familiar with just how explicit the New Testament is about the circumstances. From Matthew 27:
I believe this is especially vital when these kinds of idea is floated, like this one just from today:
Jews didn’t kill Jesus – US House of Representatives: Lawmakers have broadened the definition of anti-Semitism in the latest legislation (RT 5/2/2024)
Lucifer, Satan, the devil and Abbodan were 4 different demons known as a dragon who did all they could to sabatoge Jesus’ mission which they failed at. Jesus was to introduce the Father as Love while behaving in that way before humanity. He then decided he would allow himself to be captured to prove death isn’t real. All this greatly helped humanity.
Judas was supposed to get an honorary seat at the Sanhedrin but they lied and gave him silver instead. He realized he did all of it for nothing and hanged himself.
Regrettably, based on the extensive original research I have done, I cannot agree that that is what transpired. But everything gets to believe what pleases them and always does so anyway. Best of luck.
Ancient pagans that practiced blood sacrifice worshiped the devil in form of various different pagan gods, thousands of years before Jesus Christ was even born.
I believe that the devil (Lucifer/Satan/Osiris/Nimrod/Baal) is the fallen demon god of 1000 faces.
I think you're on the right track, but what I would respectfully suggest is that if you keep researching, in a disciplined and thorough way, always challenging your own conclusions, you will arrive at a state where you will feel comfortable dropping the use of the qualifier "I believe".
That is, of course, assuming that would be something you desired to achieve, or even considered an achievement at all. Also note, you would have to be prepared to disagree at some point with every single source you now consider an authority.
So there's meta-point: you can see why few there are which follow such a path.