a) All suggested information implies "manufactured theatre" aka manually shaped and shown to another...as oppose to perceivable inspiration; which operates auto (inception towards death) matic (life).
b) ONEs consent to another ONEs suggestion implies dualism aka one holding onto another one establishing a bond of two.
c) Ones choice selects chosen ones suggestion, while binding self into a dualism called "reason" aka one side vs another, as in...want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief; us vs them; good vs evil; rich vs poor; left vs right; enlightened vs profane; football vs soccer; on vs off; big mac vs whopper; uptown vs downtown; 1st world vs 3rd world; black vs white; nintendo vs sega; bmw vs mercedes benz; feminism vs patriarchy; vaxxed vs unvaxxed; trump vs biden; israel vs hamas; jews vs gentiles; russia vs ukraine; straight vs queer; vanilla vs chocolate; islam vs christianity; communism vs capitalism etc.
The sides don't matter...only ones choice being tempted off-center towards suggested sides matters for chosen ones.
people can't seem to take themselves out of
a) Suggested pluralism (people; them) tempts perceivable singular (person; one) to ignore self for others.
b) Being implies within...others suggest progressivism to tempt one out of/away from.
c) Consenting to suggested information implies TAKING it into possession, hence burdening self with a debt to another. Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, it needs to be let go off.
Reason operates like a chinese finger trap...holding onto any side keeps one within conflict. Only center offers release. Being implies choice (life) within balance (inception/death)...either side imbalances choice.
a) All suggested information implies "manufactured theatre" aka manually shaped and shown to another...as oppose to perceivable inspiration; which operates auto (inception towards death) matic (life).
b) ONEs consent to another ONEs suggestion implies dualism aka one holding onto another one establishing a bond of two.
c) Ones choice selects chosen ones suggestion, while binding self into a dualism called "reason" aka one side vs another, as in...want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief; us vs them; good vs evil; rich vs poor; left vs right; enlightened vs profane; football vs soccer; on vs off; big mac vs whopper; uptown vs downtown; 1st world vs 3rd world; black vs white; nintendo vs sega; bmw vs mercedes benz; feminism vs patriarchy; vaxxed vs unvaxxed; trump vs biden; israel vs hamas; jews vs gentiles; russia vs ukraine; straight vs queer; vanilla vs chocolate; islam vs christianity; communism vs capitalism etc.
The sides don't matter...only ones choice being tempted off-center towards suggested sides matters for chosen ones.
a) Suggested pluralism (people; them) tempts perceivable singular (person; one) to ignore self for others.
b) Being implies within...others suggest progressivism to tempt one out of/away from.
c) Consenting to suggested information implies TAKING it into possession, hence burdening self with a debt to another. Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, it needs to be let go off.
Reason operates like a chinese finger trap...holding onto any side keeps one within conflict. Only center offers release. Being implies choice (life) within balance (inception/death)...either side imbalances choice.