You're comparing a decentralized system (me, sharing info) with a centralized one (money issued by a central bank).
I can always revert to printing out pamphlets if the internet is heavily censored.
We won't be able to revert back to cash once digital money is fully implemented. They are already getting rid of ATMs and closing branches in Australia because people "have adopted digital payments". They are like: "Trust me bro, it's just free market supply and demand and totally not a carefully planned and socially engineered process of digitalization and getting rid of cash."
Yes, I engage in conversations about it with my peers and I pay in cash as much as possible. If everybody did just that we wouldn't have a problem to begin with.
Besides, what's wrong with using digital media to disseminate such a message? It's not a performative contradiction, it's turning the tools they use to enslave us against them. That's the whole history of the internet in a nutshell. A sword can be used to slaughter innocents and terrorize but it also can be used for self defense and to bring justice - it's a tool. The person using it is the moral agent.
Bsides, what's wrong with using digital media to disseminate such a message?
Not that there is a "wrong", it's that the people that need to be reached are not on the nets. And where the majority of people are, META, is very censorial and trend manipulating.
Fox news had peter schiff and some crypto "expert" on and it seemed strange to me the talking heads almost seemed to be shilling bitcoin as a "currency for the people"... a "rebellion against the system" and a "hedge against inflation". That's when I knew something was not right. I'm not saying you can't make a quick buck trading btc, but all of this makes you think, or should anyway.
The fact since 2009 when BTC was released, the global banking cartel never said, fuck no you can not make money from thin air, was all the red flag people needed. Instead, mysterious founder, mysterious investors propping it up, gov and oligarchs being whimsical, up to govs adopting it as currency, atms in cities?! It was always part of the plot and allowing forks was allowing peasants to normalize it.. gamers and nerds did all the work to convince plebs that digital currency works.
The most depressing thing is seeing people buy fake food, paying by phone using fake money. We're already in the metaverse.
Fake food? Like just processed trash? Or do you mean digital food? If it is the latter, it's even more depressing than the former
Haha I'm sure digital food is just around the corner, along with digital babies. I meant gmo processed trash kibble here.
Are you distributing information by informative pamphlet?
Not the gotcha you think it is.
You're comparing a decentralized system (me, sharing info) with a centralized one (money issued by a central bank).
I can always revert to printing out pamphlets if the internet is heavily censored. We won't be able to revert back to cash once digital money is fully implemented. They are already getting rid of ATMs and closing branches in Australia because people "have adopted digital payments". They are like: "Trust me bro, it's just free market supply and demand and totally not a carefully planned and socially engineered process of digitalization and getting rid of cash."
It was not a gotrch-ya, but your answer tells me all I need to know about your motivation.
Good. I made my motivation perfectly clear - I don't want controlled centralized CBDC.
Good. I made my motivation perfectly clear - I don't want controlled centralized CBDC.
Did you yet hand out anything or go around informing people in some way outside of the nets?
Yes, I engage in conversations about it with my peers and I pay in cash as much as possible. If everybody did just that we wouldn't have a problem to begin with.
Besides, what's wrong with using digital media to disseminate such a message? It's not a performative contradiction, it's turning the tools they use to enslave us against them. That's the whole history of the internet in a nutshell. A sword can be used to slaughter innocents and terrorize but it also can be used for self defense and to bring justice - it's a tool. The person using it is the moral agent.
Not that there is a "wrong", it's that the people that need to be reached are not on the nets. And where the majority of people are, META, is very censorial and trend manipulating.
If printed in a language the general public can understand this could be made into a flier to get people in the know.
Fox news had peter schiff and some crypto "expert" on and it seemed strange to me the talking heads almost seemed to be shilling bitcoin as a "currency for the people"... a "rebellion against the system" and a "hedge against inflation". That's when I knew something was not right. I'm not saying you can't make a quick buck trading btc, but all of this makes you think, or should anyway.
The fact since 2009 when BTC was released, the global banking cartel never said, fuck no you can not make money from thin air, was all the red flag people needed. Instead, mysterious founder, mysterious investors propping it up, gov and oligarchs being whimsical, up to govs adopting it as currency, atms in cities?! It was always part of the plot and allowing forks was allowing peasants to normalize it.. gamers and nerds did all the work to convince plebs that digital currency works.
Purposely, socially devalue crypto. Problem solved.
Money is going digital so learn how to use digital cash (Monero) if you want to preserve your freedom.
https://moneromeans.money