Alot of stuff you said, isnt worth response, like when you talk to me like a child who doesn't understand the size of the globe or how eyes work.
Please.
Refraction isn't really at play, and also, wouldn't work like you said.
This is what refraction looks like (do a google image search on "refraction boat")
Occam's razor. If it looks like it's flat, and behaves likes it's flat, it's probably flat. Keep that in mind because the CN tower base disappearing first the observation we expect, based on simple laws of linear perspective.
If I had to guess, I think you have to understand perspective better. How objects move in our vision (or a lens, same thing). It's all around us, but you may be surprised to realize how little thought you put into it. Linear perspective is so obvious it's hard to think about.
As things get father from you, they will collapse into the horizon. This has to be understood or you just won't be able to move forward.
So, the CN tower, or a boat at sea, will "disappear" bottom first, because the bottom is closest to the horizon. Just like if you are top of the tower, you can see all the way across the lake, but when you are at the base of the tower, you cannot. When you are higher, you have a longer optical range, because the horizon is lower in your view.
This is something you can visualise by laying on the a large flat area.
By moving your eyes to the ground, you are simulating a short optical range. Now, have a friend walk away from you, after about 100 feet, you will notice their feet aren't visible.
But when you stand up, you see the ground is flat.
But when you lay down, the principles of linear perspective are much more noticeable because your optical range is much shorter. Your friend isn't walking around the curve of earth, you just need to spend some time thinking about what you are observing.
If you ever took a debate class, you might remember that you don't always get to choose what side you have to argue. And that's where debate preparation matters. You aren't prepared to defend flat earth, so you aren't prepared to debunk it either
On a flat earth, objects don't disappear behind a horizon. If you move away from CN Tower, it would keep getting smaller and smaller. On a spherical earth, the CN tower would start disappearing bottom-up and getting smaller.
Perspectives don't cause things to disappear. The "mountain" growing between you and the CN tower is what is obstructing the view. The "mountain" is the curvature of the Earth.
"after about 100 feet, you will notice their feet aren't visible."
As his feet get smaller it's hard to distinguish them from the ground. Use binoculars, and you will have no problem.
All objects disappear past the visible horizon. It's a law of optics. How can we have a productive conversation of you can't admit basic laws of high school level physics.
Objects will go lower and lower until you cannot see them due to them being too small (but then use long range lense). Or, if it's a very large object, like 60km diameter like the sun and moon, then you can see it as far as your horizontal limit.
If you increase in elevation, then you can witness the sun fade away, dues to Beers law.
Just google, "sun fade away"
Sorry for not addressing the rest of your message, we can, but I think this point is more critical as it's a basic stepping stone in understanding.
A horizon only exists as block in the field of vision. For example, I can't see my neighbors house because of the fence between us. To see the house, I raise my self on a chair, and force the horizon to be LOWER.
On a flat earth, with flat topography, the horizon and the infinite point are the same thing.
Nothing would dip below the horizon, because there is no obstruction.
Perspective does not cause dipping below a horizon.
On a spherical earth we'd expect a "mountain" to form between you and an object you are moving away from. This mountain is the curvature of the eartg. The top of this mountain is called the horizon. As you move away from object, the mountain grows, obscuring the bottom of the object.
The reason I can't see Paris from my house is because of this mountain. Slice this obscuring section off the Earth, and I'll see Paris with a good enough telescope.
Nothing would dip below the horizon, because there is no obstruction.
You just violated physics there. Dipping below the horizon will always be a fiction of elevation, on an infinite plane.
But, you cannot see forever in an atmosphere (hate having to use that term, they use language to control though too, in case you didn't know already) due to Beers law. And you witness that with Sun fade away videos you can witness from numerous drones with high power lenses.
You are wasting your time trying to get me reindoctrinated.
Look up CN tower flat earth on any search engine and you find information dominance, (ie, psy op) with pages after page of anti flat earth narrative. that alone, can be evidence, when you know what google is. But I digress.
You are showing a misunderstanding of optical law, and I think you need some visual aid. But, since links are not allowed, you have to do some typing. ww .theflatearthpodcast (dot] com (forward Slash) portfolio (forward Slash) long-distance-infrared-photography-exposes-globe-lie-mt-st-jacinto-from-123-miles-by-jtolan-media1
Alot of stuff you said, isnt worth response, like when you talk to me like a child who doesn't understand the size of the globe or how eyes work. Please.
Refraction isn't really at play, and also, wouldn't work like you said. This is what refraction looks like (do a google image search on "refraction boat")
Occam's razor. If it looks like it's flat, and behaves likes it's flat, it's probably flat. Keep that in mind because the CN tower base disappearing first the observation we expect, based on simple laws of linear perspective.
If I had to guess, I think you have to understand perspective better. How objects move in our vision (or a lens, same thing). It's all around us, but you may be surprised to realize how little thought you put into it. Linear perspective is so obvious it's hard to think about.
As things get father from you, they will collapse into the horizon. This has to be understood or you just won't be able to move forward.
So, the CN tower, or a boat at sea, will "disappear" bottom first, because the bottom is closest to the horizon. Just like if you are top of the tower, you can see all the way across the lake, but when you are at the base of the tower, you cannot. When you are higher, you have a longer optical range, because the horizon is lower in your view.
This is something you can visualise by laying on the a large flat area. By moving your eyes to the ground, you are simulating a short optical range. Now, have a friend walk away from you, after about 100 feet, you will notice their feet aren't visible.
But when you stand up, you see the ground is flat.
But when you lay down, the principles of linear perspective are much more noticeable because your optical range is much shorter. Your friend isn't walking around the curve of earth, you just need to spend some time thinking about what you are observing.
If you ever took a debate class, you might remember that you don't always get to choose what side you have to argue. And that's where debate preparation matters. You aren't prepared to defend flat earth, so you aren't prepared to debunk it either
On a flat earth, objects don't disappear behind a horizon. If you move away from CN Tower, it would keep getting smaller and smaller. On a spherical earth, the CN tower would start disappearing bottom-up and getting smaller.
Perspectives don't cause things to disappear. The "mountain" growing between you and the CN tower is what is obstructing the view. The "mountain" is the curvature of the Earth.
"after about 100 feet, you will notice their feet aren't visible."
As his feet get smaller it's hard to distinguish them from the ground. Use binoculars, and you will have no problem.
All objects disappear past the visible horizon. It's a law of optics. How can we have a productive conversation of you can't admit basic laws of high school level physics.
Objects will go lower and lower until you cannot see them due to them being too small (but then use long range lense). Or, if it's a very large object, like 60km diameter like the sun and moon, then you can see it as far as your horizontal limit.
If you increase in elevation, then you can witness the sun fade away, dues to Beers law.
Just google, "sun fade away"
Sorry for not addressing the rest of your message, we can, but I think this point is more critical as it's a basic stepping stone in understanding.
A horizon only exists as block in the field of vision. For example, I can't see my neighbors house because of the fence between us. To see the house, I raise my self on a chair, and force the horizon to be LOWER.
On a flat earth, with flat topography, the horizon and the infinite point are the same thing.
Nothing would dip below the horizon, because there is no obstruction.
Perspective does not cause dipping below a horizon.
On a spherical earth we'd expect a "mountain" to form between you and an object you are moving away from. This mountain is the curvature of the eartg. The top of this mountain is called the horizon. As you move away from object, the mountain grows, obscuring the bottom of the object.
The reason I can't see Paris from my house is because of this mountain. Slice this obscuring section off the Earth, and I'll see Paris with a good enough telescope.
You just violated physics there. Dipping below the horizon will always be a fiction of elevation, on an infinite plane.
But, you cannot see forever in an atmosphere (hate having to use that term, they use language to control though too, in case you didn't know already) due to Beers law. And you witness that with Sun fade away videos you can witness from numerous drones with high power lenses.
Violation of Beers law, learn shit. I dare you
I love the point you made at the bottom. Use binoculars and the boat that went past the horizon, comes back into view
Flat.
Literally doesn't. You saw a picture of CN Tower already using optical enhacement. There is no return of its base.
You can't see past the mountain of water between you and CN Tower.
Only refraction can help, but it's very slight.
You are wasting your time trying to get me reindoctrinated.
Look up CN tower flat earth on any search engine and you find information dominance, (ie, psy op) with pages after page of anti flat earth narrative. that alone, can be evidence, when you know what google is. But I digress.
You are showing a misunderstanding of optical law, and I think you need some visual aid. But, since links are not allowed, you have to do some typing. ww .theflatearthpodcast (dot] com (forward Slash) portfolio (forward Slash) long-distance-infrared-photography-exposes-globe-lie-mt-st-jacinto-from-123-miles-by-jtolan-media1