On a flat earth, objects don't disappear behind a horizon. If you move away from CN Tower, it would keep getting smaller and smaller. On a spherical earth, the CN tower would start disappearing bottom-up and getting smaller.
Perspectives don't cause things to disappear. The "mountain" growing between you and the CN tower is what is obstructing the view. The "mountain" is the curvature of the Earth.
"after about 100 feet, you will notice their feet aren't visible."
As his feet get smaller it's hard to distinguish them from the ground. Use binoculars, and you will have no problem.
All objects disappear past the visible horizon. It's a law of optics. How can we have a productive conversation of you can't admit basic laws of high school level physics.
Objects will go lower and lower until you cannot see them due to them being too small (but then use long range lense). Or, if it's a very large object, like 60km diameter like the sun and moon, then you can see it as far as your horizontal limit.
If you increase in elevation, then you can witness the sun fade away, dues to Beers law.
Just google, "sun fade away"
Sorry for not addressing the rest of your message, we can, but I think this point is more critical as it's a basic stepping stone in understanding.
A horizon only exists as block in the field of vision. For example, I can't see my neighbors house because of the fence between us. To see the house, I raise my self on a chair, and force the horizon to be LOWER.
On a flat earth, with flat topography, the horizon and the infinite point are the same thing.
Nothing would dip below the horizon, because there is no obstruction.
Perspective does not cause dipping below a horizon.
On a spherical earth we'd expect a "mountain" to form between you and an object you are moving away from. This mountain is the curvature of the eartg. The top of this mountain is called the horizon. As you move away from object, the mountain grows, obscuring the bottom of the object.
The reason I can't see Paris from my house is because of this mountain. Slice this obscuring section off the Earth, and I'll see Paris with a good enough telescope.
Nothing would dip below the horizon, because there is no obstruction.
You just violated physics there. Dipping below the horizon will always be a fiction of elevation, on an infinite plane.
But, you cannot see forever in an atmosphere (hate having to use that term, they use language to control though too, in case you didn't know already) due to Beers law. And you witness that with Sun fade away videos you can witness from numerous drones with high power lenses.
You are wasting your time trying to get me reindoctrinated.
Look up CN tower flat earth on any search engine and you find information dominance, (ie, psy op) with pages after page of anti flat earth narrative. that alone, can be evidence, when you know what google is. But I digress.
You are showing a misunderstanding of optical law, and I think you need some visual aid. But, since links are not allowed, you have to do some typing. ww .theflatearthpodcast (dot] com (forward Slash) portfolio (forward Slash) long-distance-infrared-photography-exposes-globe-lie-mt-st-jacinto-from-123-miles-by-jtolan-media1
On a flat earth, objects don't disappear behind a horizon. If you move away from CN Tower, it would keep getting smaller and smaller. On a spherical earth, the CN tower would start disappearing bottom-up and getting smaller.
Perspectives don't cause things to disappear. The "mountain" growing between you and the CN tower is what is obstructing the view. The "mountain" is the curvature of the Earth.
"after about 100 feet, you will notice their feet aren't visible."
As his feet get smaller it's hard to distinguish them from the ground. Use binoculars, and you will have no problem.
All objects disappear past the visible horizon. It's a law of optics. How can we have a productive conversation of you can't admit basic laws of high school level physics.
Objects will go lower and lower until you cannot see them due to them being too small (but then use long range lense). Or, if it's a very large object, like 60km diameter like the sun and moon, then you can see it as far as your horizontal limit.
If you increase in elevation, then you can witness the sun fade away, dues to Beers law.
Just google, "sun fade away"
Sorry for not addressing the rest of your message, we can, but I think this point is more critical as it's a basic stepping stone in understanding.
A horizon only exists as block in the field of vision. For example, I can't see my neighbors house because of the fence between us. To see the house, I raise my self on a chair, and force the horizon to be LOWER.
On a flat earth, with flat topography, the horizon and the infinite point are the same thing.
Nothing would dip below the horizon, because there is no obstruction.
Perspective does not cause dipping below a horizon.
On a spherical earth we'd expect a "mountain" to form between you and an object you are moving away from. This mountain is the curvature of the eartg. The top of this mountain is called the horizon. As you move away from object, the mountain grows, obscuring the bottom of the object.
The reason I can't see Paris from my house is because of this mountain. Slice this obscuring section off the Earth, and I'll see Paris with a good enough telescope.
You just violated physics there. Dipping below the horizon will always be a fiction of elevation, on an infinite plane.
But, you cannot see forever in an atmosphere (hate having to use that term, they use language to control though too, in case you didn't know already) due to Beers law. And you witness that with Sun fade away videos you can witness from numerous drones with high power lenses.
Violation of Beers law, learn shit. I dare you
I love the point you made at the bottom. Use binoculars and the boat that went past the horizon, comes back into view
Flat.
Literally doesn't. You saw a picture of CN Tower already using optical enhacement. There is no return of its base.
You can't see past the mountain of water between you and CN Tower.
Only refraction can help, but it's very slight.
You are wasting your time trying to get me reindoctrinated.
Look up CN tower flat earth on any search engine and you find information dominance, (ie, psy op) with pages after page of anti flat earth narrative. that alone, can be evidence, when you know what google is. But I digress.
You are showing a misunderstanding of optical law, and I think you need some visual aid. But, since links are not allowed, you have to do some typing. ww .theflatearthpodcast (dot] com (forward Slash) portfolio (forward Slash) long-distance-infrared-photography-exposes-globe-lie-mt-st-jacinto-from-123-miles-by-jtolan-media1
You calling Magellan a liar?