The US government is just a jewish puppet show.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Revelations 2:9 and 3:9 makes it pretty clear that today’s Jews aren’t the chosen people. You are confusing old covenant with new. Jesus was a Gentile, not a Jew.
I posted this in another thread a while ago:
Don’t confuse the Old Law (testament) with New Law that governs Christians today. How does God behave differently between the Laws/testaments? Does the difference in laws account for these differences? The lineages of the people you mention are fairly clear. Hebrew is probably the most muddled.
Israelites = Abrahamic lineage and covenant under the Old Testament
Jews = Lineage from Cain, Nimrod, tribe of Judah, currently Synagogue of Satan as referenced in Revelations. Imposters of the original Jews who are now gone.
Semites = Arabs, lineage of Ishmael from Abraham’s son with Hagar, the Egyptian servant. They will likely play a role in destroying/weakening the Synagouge. You can see that happening today.
Hebrews = Likely Abrahamic lineage but less clear in Bible references, likely depending on author of the book in question.
If Jesus was a Gentile and not a Jew then why, in his conversation with the Samaritan woman in John 4:1-45 does he acknowledge himself as a Jew? Why didn’t he correct the Samaritan woman when she termed him a Jew (John 4:9)?
Why did he then go on to reference himself as a Jew in John 4:22?
You say that the so-called original Jews are not gone and in their place stands an impostor.
What is your reason for believing that’s there were separate, original Jews who are now gone? And, were that so, then how do you account for Jesus stating that salvation was of the Jews? False messiah? Simply defeated? Simple error?
There’s some good commentary on John 4 (KJV). Jesus never agreed or acknowledges that he is a Jew, that’s the Samarian woman’s assumption. The conversation starts with her assuming Jesus is a thirsty Jew, then her perception and realization changes to Him being a prophet, and finally the Messiah. Jesus brought (or tried to bring) reformation to Judaism but was not a Jew himself, he was a Gentile and Israelite. Judaism is a false religion and that’s why Revelations calls out Jews as the Synagouge of Satan. When Jesus was crucified by the Romans (with heavy involvement from the Jews), they mocked Jesus as the “King of the Jews” because he was trying to Reform Judaism, not because he was a Jew.
Some commentaries you could study on this chapter (as well as the meaning of Revelations 2 and 3) are Henry’s and Spurgeon’s.
You have neglected to acknowledge the part where Jesus affirmed himself as a Jew when talking to the Samaritan woman when he tells her
Jhn 4:22 Ye worship ye know not what: we (meaning Jews) know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.
Also, Revelation don’t call out the Jews as the synagogue of Satan. It calls out Jews who say they are Jews but are not. There’s a huge distinction here. It is NOT saying that Jews are the synagogue of Satan. It is saying that fake, impostor Jews are. By implication, the ‘Real Jews’ must presumably still be gods chosen people and are simply the victim of some horrid identity theft. The perennial victim again.
This is an error that so many people make when reading this part of Revelation. It’s understandable but a more careful reading should make this nuance stand out pretty clearly.
You have much to learn. I suggest you begin here: https://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/judaica/jew-or-judahite/