Do politicians no longer serve at the pleasure of the people? Wasn't the second amendment a protection against tyrannical government? AREN'T THEY SUPPOSED TO BE TERRIFIED OF THEIR CONSTITUENTS?!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Nice copy and paste job...with an inch deep understanding of the meaning behind what you're copying and pasting.
Go sit in the corner you stupid child. I've got a medal from the Civil War on my nightstand, it was my Great Great Great Grandfathers from Gettysburg, bitch.
I'm sure you do have a medal, silly goose. I have a relative who died at Antietam. But that doesn't change the fact that the very Founders who rebelled against England and put in the Bill of Rights, passed the Alien and Sedition actions and put down the Whiskey Rebellion.
The Founders knew what a domestic terrorist was. And while I agree that their definition wouldn't be the fed's definition today, it certainly isn't your definition either.
Edit: Let me apologize, I mistook your username for a foreign shill I see on here. Still, I stand by the rest.
Yeah and they owned people who worked for them without pay Obviously they aren't perfect but suggesting they would allow the current government to continue is asinine
No, the name was Putnum. The man, who died, wore blue. I'm married to Southerners, though, and I have a respect for the Lost Cause.