Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

15
12%of Russians Experience Panic Attack (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 2 years ago by Merely_a_conduit 2 years ago by Merely_a_conduit +15 / -0
68 comments download share
68 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Merely_a_conduit [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Idk about that if you're born into a shell game is it your fault? We live in one of most abundant times in history when it comes to Maslow's hierarchy of needs but there's an underlying false scarcity by the nature of the national religion Capitalism. We've been raised to want and never be satiated. If someone is brainwashed and they commit a crime is it on them or the person who brainwashed them? I do think victimhood culture is some sick fad but even us speaking about this is a strike against the system that binds us all, however miniscule

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TallestSkil 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Idk about that if you're born into a shell game is it your fault?

I know; I wrestle with that a lot. Our knowledge confers us with a duty to act. We refuse to. But the situation we’ve been handed wasn’t our fault; it was the fault of our ancestors–who didn’t act. Do we blame them? The living or just the dead? Does blaming them–and acting against them–serve the purposes of our true enemies? Or is it a necessary sub-act, like applying suction to remove the loose blood impeding your vision during surgery.

We live in one of most abundant times in history when it comes to Maslow's hierarchy of needs

I prefer Max-Neef’s. He’s not a jew, for one. I feel our thinking needs not be clouded by their interpretation of existence.

but there's an underlying false scarcity by the nature of the national religion Capitalism.

Tentative agreement with the statement, provided we concur not to pin down the definition of the word ‘capitalism’ until there’s agreement upon it.

even us speaking about this is a strike against the system that binds us all, however miniscule

Yes. I just wish it mattered.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Donkeybutt75 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Our knowledge confers us with a duty to act. We refuse to. But the situation we’ve been handed wasn’t our fault; it was the fault of our ancestors–who didn’t act. Do we blame them? The living or just the dead?

If we know and refuse, then we are doing exactly the same thing our predecessors did, so we can't blame (especially considering they probably were less aware of it than we are).

My feeling is everyone should be doing that which they think will actually move towards the thing you want. Whatever that is that in your mind is the best incremental path there, always be moving along that path.

I personally don't think violence is tenable path, I've said a hundred times here but my path is work towards decentralization (become able to sustain outside of the system, help others to do so as well, build networks of such people locally, build regional networks/alliances for safety and trade). I consistently make progress on making that a reality in the ways that I can.

Everyone should be doing the same. Even talking about and raising awareness of this stuff makes progress. Waking up one ignorant bastard at a time does make it harder to advance these agendas. Wherever it is you want to get to, determine the incremental path that you believe best gets you there, and constantly move along that path.

Tentative agreement with the statement, provided we concur not to pin down the definition of the word ‘capitalism’ until there’s agreement upon it.

Be careful with the anti-capitalism stuff. Monopoly is the problem, not free markets. There is no perfect system, and human nature guarantees that the trend will always be towards centralization of power. Socialism, communism, et al, just skip the work and give all power to a central authority. Decentralization (including anti-trust) is what yields individual liberty and a middle class, and meritocracy is the best driver of quality.

Make no mistake, though, no matter what, the trend will always move back towards centralizing power, which means people must always work against centralized power. Once they give up, or stop paying attention, they will lose everything they gained (as can clearly be seen by looking around today).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TallestSkil 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I personally don't think violence is tenable path

Then you’ve already lost and white genocide is complete. You’re psychotic. There are exactly zero other options.

Be careful with the anti-capitalism stuff.

Hence why we need a definition before being able to discuss “capitalism.”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Donkeybutt75 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Then you’ve already lost and white genocide is complete. You’re psychotic. There are exactly zero other options.

Are you doing anything (rhetorical)? Usually the people pushing for violence against the most technologically advanced military the world has ever known don't actually do anything more than talk.

Maybe I should clarify what I meant by violence, though. The direct kinetic war against the federal government advocated for regularly by fedposters cannot possibly ever be successful. And any kind of organizing effort would be infiltrated, every time.

Yes, asymmetric warfare would likely generally need to happen at some point, but you can't do that before you are able to live independent of the system. And you need numbers. So, yes, decentralization that is difficult to infiltrate and creates an alternate pathway for others wanting to exit is the most viable first step.

Even the types of things you've mentioned before require an alternate system already be in the works, or you just create chaos for them to come in and make order out of.

Secret societies may be another viable option, but that means you must do the same things the bad guys do to ensure loyalty, etc. It's not for most people.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy