Justify my claims that the article is canary in the coalmine and people shouldn't listen to corporations that put profit over the health of their customers? I don't think you know what critical thinking is.
I claimed whoever wrote the article was trying to avoid using the word Vaccine and that is obvious If you have nothing interesting to say I'll be moving on now
Justify my claims that the article is canary in the coalmine and people shouldn't listen to corporations that put profit over the health of their customers? I don't think you know what critical thinking is.
that wasn't your claim
I claimed whoever wrote the article was trying to avoid using the word Vaccine and that is obvious If you have nothing interesting to say I'll be moving on now
you claimed legal had advised them against it on the basis of liability, which is quite different
How is it different?