Do you really think, outside of your fantasies, that any judge in any court would find for a litigant who said they were coerced into a medical procedure by a news writer using the word "vaccine" ?
And, moreover, that the "legal team" were consulted over the use of "vax" vs "vaccine" and they advised to use "vax" to avoid liability of coercion.
The entire premise is laughable and you are a clown for putting it forward.
It's not the use of the word vaccine because they didn't even use the term, it's the insinuation that it is a "vaccine" and knowingly obfuscating that it is not. You seem angry? 🤣😂
Coercion, into illegal medical experimentation.
lol, you are ridiculous
Ok child
Do you really think, outside of your fantasies, that any judge in any court would find for a litigant who said they were coerced into a medical procedure by a news writer using the word "vaccine" ?
And, moreover, that the "legal team" were consulted over the use of "vax" vs "vaccine" and they advised to use "vax" to avoid liability of coercion.
The entire premise is laughable and you are a clown for putting it forward.
It's not the use of the word vaccine because they didn't even use the term, it's the insinuation that it is a "vaccine" and knowingly obfuscating that it is not. You seem angry? 🤣😂