"To protect the righteous, to annihilate the wicked, and to reestablish the principles of dharma I appear on this earth, age after age."
BG 4.8: Chapter 4, Verse 8 Bhagavad Gita,
This will be way too complex, way too deep and hard to even emotionally tackle by 90% of who even try to view this.
See if you are the capable few who can stretch their imagination, belief and intellect.
You don't have to agree (I certainly don't), but it does give you food for thought on:
What do the human philosophical elite think, believe and based on what do they act
How they see themselves as separate from 99% of the humanity
How Religions are control narratives for emotionally bound NPCs (90% of population)
How the elite have killed "god" and want to become as "god"
And how gene-editing, psychic esoteric knowledge, AI, transhumanism are their pathways to this
Why NPCs will never be part of this , but can be mostly be programmed with religion, fear, entertainment, mind control and even replaced by automatons
How they are counting on technological singularity (re: Ray Kurzweil et al.)
How the human layer is influenced, controlled and fought against by a non-human layer (peon minds think "god", but hey are not "gods")
How all of this will result in a conflict that will shape the future of earth and humanity
"A conflict is coming, which is unlike any war humanity has faced in history. It is going to be a war for the earth and to decide the nature and future of man. Reality is, it means the mass extinction of the majority of the human race."
IN'TELLECT, noun (Latin intelligo, to understand)...standing under implies repressing self by holding onto suggested; hence ignoring to draw out (stretch) inspiration from knowledge (perceivable).
Knowledge inspires stretching; intellect tempts repression of self and suppression by another.
What do the human philosophical elite think, believe and based on what do they act
a) Nature acts; those within can only react, hence ELITE (French élite) - "selection, choice"...
b) If many ignore to react to perceivable; then a suggesting few are permitted to react at will to mass ignorance.
How they see themselves as separate from 99% of the humanity
If many consent to what few suggest; then few remain apart from an aggregated many.
How Religions are control narratives for emotionally bound NPCs (90% of population)
RELGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...nature sets each ones free will of choice apart from one another; choosing to ignore this by consenting to the suggested choices of others BINDS ones FREE will of choice underneath a chosen ones suggestion.
How the elite have killed "god" and want to become as "god"
If "god" gave choice to each one; the selecting (elite) any chosen ones contradicts one's choice.
Few suggest the label "chosen ones" to distract each one of many from "one's choice"...consenting to that label permits few to suggest in the name of (in nomine) for example patris et filii et spiritus sancti.
Labels aren't attached to nature; unless those within nature choose to hold onto artificial labels.
And how....are their pathways
Only one way/path (inception towards death) for each wanderer (life)...ones consent to any suggested pathways narrows ones transform/exchange/walk/wander.
How the human layer is influenced...
Fluid (inception towards death) sets solids (life) apart from one another. Others tempt solids to hold onto each other; which establishes layers.
Masons of free (will of choice) utilize suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within ones mind/memory. These bricks are layered upon each other...
how all of this will result...
If will responds (re) to pass over (sult) perceivable origin for suggested outcomes; then death will pass over life....few are feasting upon the passover of many.
factdigger says noone has 2.5hrs to watch anything then posts a 2hr+ video lol
I like the content of the video from an anthropological point of view, but this guy is lost in associative nonsense. He has read too many things without looking into the knowledge left behind by far wiser ones than Nietzche/Socrates/etc
This will be way too complex, way too deep and hard to even emotionally tackle by 90% of who even try to view this.
See if you are the capable few who can stretch their imagination, belief and intellect.
You don't have to agree (I certainly don't), but it does give you food for thought on:
I say, bring it on. I'm ready.
IN'TELLECT, noun (Latin intelligo, to understand)...standing under implies repressing self by holding onto suggested; hence ignoring to draw out (stretch) inspiration from knowledge (perceivable).
Knowledge inspires stretching; intellect tempts repression of self and suppression by another.
a) Nature acts; those within can only react, hence ELITE (French élite) - "selection, choice"...
b) If many ignore to react to perceivable; then a suggesting few are permitted to react at will to mass ignorance.
If many consent to what few suggest; then few remain apart from an aggregated many.
RELGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...nature sets each ones free will of choice apart from one another; choosing to ignore this by consenting to the suggested choices of others BINDS ones FREE will of choice underneath a chosen ones suggestion.
If "god" gave choice to each one; the selecting (elite) any chosen ones contradicts one's choice.
Few suggest the label "chosen ones" to distract each one of many from "one's choice"...consenting to that label permits few to suggest in the name of (in nomine) for example patris et filii et spiritus sancti.
Labels aren't attached to nature; unless those within nature choose to hold onto artificial labels.
Only one way/path (inception towards death) for each wanderer (life)...ones consent to any suggested pathways narrows ones transform/exchange/walk/wander.
Fluid (inception towards death) sets solids (life) apart from one another. Others tempt solids to hold onto each other; which establishes layers.
Masons of free (will of choice) utilize suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within ones mind/memory. These bricks are layered upon each other...
If will responds (re) to pass over (sult) perceivable origin for suggested outcomes; then death will pass over life....few are feasting upon the passover of many.
factdigger says noone has 2.5hrs to watch anything then posts a 2hr+ video lol
I like the content of the video from an anthropological point of view, but this guy is lost in associative nonsense. He has read too many things without looking into the knowledge left behind by far wiser ones than Nietzche/Socrates/etc