Considering he may be one of them, one of the purposes behind this might be to widen Overton Window.
It goes like this: The digital panopticon and social credit score is already a done deal. It is already in the plans. What they need to do now is to somehow sell it to the general public.
Enter Overton Window. A way to coerce people into accepting something they would never thought of to accept otherwise.
It goes something like this and consists of several phases:
First that something is simply unthinkable. People go about their lives without even thinking about it. (In our case that would be total suveillance and social credit score.)
Then the concept is being entered into public consciousness as remotely possible, but still generally unthinkable.
Next step is making it technically possible, but still widely unacceptable.
Next comes the debatable phase. It is still unacceptable, but somehow becomes debatable. Various public debates are initiated. Pros and cons are being weighted. <--- This is where we are at now and quite possibly the very purpose of Peterson's speech was to move public perception from unacceptable to debatable phase.
Following phases are as follows:
Generally acceptable.
Encouraged and favourable.
Mandatory.
In any case, it's just a thought. I don't know if I'm correct or not. Quite possibly Peterson genuinely wants to warn people... But if I'm onto something, then other terms to look up would be Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis and Hegelian Dialectic. Or, to simplify a bit, the same old Good Cop - Bad Cop thing we've all seen in the movies.
Also, the fact that it is being published by Forbes - of all fucking places - does not help. Not in the least.
lol yeah all the money and power would be useless without his type
omg you are tilted at this guy
psychology 101: that which you don't like outside yourself is that which you don't like inside yourself
instead of being all emo about one guy who does videos on youtube and a few other things focus on the actual real problems omg
you do realize that the prime ministers and presidents and their corrupt politician paid off people are FAR worse people than this guy could ever be right?
and you realize that the politician's bosses are FAR FAR worse people than they are? sheesh wtf
Considering he may be one of them, one of the purposes behind this might be to widen Overton Window.
It goes like this: The digital panopticon and social credit score is already a done deal. It is already in the plans. What they need to do now is to somehow sell it to the general public.
Enter Overton Window. A way to coerce people into accepting something they would never thought of to accept otherwise.
It goes something like this and consists of several phases:
First that something is simply unthinkable. People go about their lives without even thinking about it. (In our case that would be total suveillance and social credit score.)
Then the concept is being entered into public consciousness as remotely possible, but still generally unthinkable.
Next step is making it technically possible, but still widely unacceptable.
Next comes the debatable phase. It is still unacceptable, but somehow becomes debatable. Various public debates are initiated. Pros and cons are being weighted. <--- This is where we are at now and quite possibly the very purpose of Peterson's speech was to move public perception from unacceptable to debatable phase.
Following phases are as follows:
Generally acceptable.
Encouraged and favourable.
Mandatory.
In any case, it's just a thought. I don't know if I'm correct or not. Quite possibly Peterson genuinely wants to warn people... But if I'm onto something, then other terms to look up would be Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis and Hegelian Dialectic. Or, to simplify a bit, the same old Good Cop - Bad Cop thing we've all seen in the movies.
Also, the fact that it is being published by Forbes - of all fucking places - does not help. Not in the least.
Peterstein is our very worst enemy. He is one of them. He is told what to say: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OSWWZ8ntpuEM/
Very worst lol
Pretty sure the corrupt old money families and their dark arts priests are far worse a problem than this guy
They wouldn't be able to do anything without his traitor type. A wolf in a sheep's clothing is far more dangerous than a wolf.
lol yeah all the money and power would be useless without his type
omg you are tilted at this guy
psychology 101: that which you don't like outside yourself is that which you don't like inside yourself
instead of being all emo about one guy who does videos on youtube and a few other things focus on the actual real problems omg
you do realize that the prime ministers and presidents and their corrupt politician paid off people are FAR worse people than this guy could ever be right?
and you realize that the politician's bosses are FAR FAR worse people than they are? sheesh wtf