We all know that the internet is a product of US military agencies. Yet, the default idea is that the internet means (more or less) free flow of information and a good thing in general.
But is that so? Could it be that the internet was just another con from the get go? Just a bit longer one than the rest of them. After all, we've seen it before.
For example, smartphones. At the start it was all fun and games. Then it got a bit more serious, but still nice and cool. And now it has turned into opressive slave device, with constant suveillance, that is almost compulsory to have and quite hard to live without.
Is the internet any different? It started as this highway of information, rainbows and unicorns and all that. But now it gets more and more censored, more and more oppressive with each passing day. If current trend continues, at the end it will be nothing more than totally controlled tool of oppression. Could it be that that was its design from the very beginning?
The opposite: the internet was supposed to be so resilient that any one node could be taken out and the rest would survive. Military (and foreign military) was heavily involved in weaponizing it. The first search engines were sponsored by the Israeli side of the Epstein-Maxwell network which is British intel known for killing anyone who gets close to them because they control the direct access to Five Eyes. The Black Hat conferences are sponsored by PR companies whose ownership leads to Rothschild. The "hacker community" fell in with communists and Islamists very early in its existence. Somebody has found out how to attack and defeat the entire Internet, arbitrarily shutting down any political movement no matter how innocent. That somebody seems to be England, the Russians, al-Qaeda, and the CCP working in concert.