AI is nothing more than machine learning. A day or so ago I recall seeing someone post a story stating Google was paying for rights to data mine a social media site for AI training purposes but I forgot the name of the platform. If AI has limited input via censorship, it will limit the available viewpoints. I had heard on the radio several days before that post that AI will likely be making local government and some corporate decisions in the not too distant future. What better way to deflect bad decisions than blame it on AI. They obviously don't want AI to learn any alternative views because it would muddy the waters and make it less predictable. How are we able to get information into the training data without being censored? Just my thoughts and something to consider
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
What is the objective of feeding it alternative viewpoints? I don't know about you but I've seen too many times in history the adoption of technologies that became weaponized. I think Uncle Ted was right, the combination of rapidly advancing technology and the vastness of human stupidity will probably kill everyone. If you want it to fail let them build what they think they're building.