Keep your life free from love of money and be content with what you have. If we have food and clothing, with these we should be content. We brought nothing into the world, and we cannot take anything out of the world. Better is the little that the righteous has than the abundance of many wicked. For the arms of the wicked shall be broken, but the LORD upholds the righteous.
Those who desire to be rich fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the Christian faith and pierced themselves with many pangs.
Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourself treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.
CONTENT, adjective - "to be held; to hold; contained within limits"...neither food; nor cloth can be held onto. Nature generates temporary sustenance (life) within ongoing limits (inception towards death); which implies a setting of "free" will of choice; not a containment.
Ones consent to hold onto the suggested information by another implies ones mind containing suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
a) Suggested the-ism tempts one to hold onto authority of another by submission of self.
b) Suggested moralism tempts one to hold onto a conflict of reason (love vs hate).
c) Money implies M-ONE-Y (my one) aka an ownership claim, hence once again a choice to hold onto a claimed possession.
a) To be implies as one apart from one another...others suggest pluralism (we) to tempt singular (one) to ignore self; yet it's oneself that chooses to hold onto "we" aka to shape suggestions in the name of (in nomine) others.
b) Everything WAS before anyone within came (inception towards death) to be (life)...suggesting to each other what it should be tempts one to ignore being within; in response to and out of origin.
One cannot apply "should" to natural law without ignoring that natural law forces one to adapt.
Nothing aka suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) implies ones consensual de-nial of everything perceivable aka that which brought/brings (inception towards death) one in/out of being (life).
Yet...one (singular) took we (plural) from a chosen ones suggestion.
Nature designates whole into partial units (ones)...those within then choose to aggregate/collectivize other ones into "we the people" aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc.
RIGHT implies straight (inception towards death); WICKED implies departed/partial (life).
LORD implies ruler; rule; reg - "move in a straight line" aka inception towards death as the righteous (straight) lord (moving line) upholding (loss generating growth) wicked partials (life).
a) Rise (life) within fall (inception towards death) aka resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
b) Into implies being within (in) + moved towards (to).
c) Temptation implies temporary (life) within action (inception towards death).
ROFL okay.