Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

15
Graphene - what is it doing in mRNA vaccines? (odysee.com)
posted 1 year ago by Neo1 1 year ago by Neo1 +15 / -0
Whats Next - part 3 - Graphene
The use of Graphene in mRNA vaccines, self-assembling matter and more.
odysee.com
31 comments share
31 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– CrazyRussian 2 points 1 year ago +3 / -1

Graphene is diamagnetic. Like copper or bismuth.

Graphene oxide is paramagnetic, like aluminium or platinum.

Paramagnetic is barely react to magnetic field. Diamagnetic is pushed out from magnetic field. None of both, even in pure form could hold any available magnet, not even talking about some sparse particles in amount of micrograms.

It is ferromagnetics that could be attracted by magnets with significant force.

So, magnetic properties of mRNA jab spot could be proof of some ferromagnetic, like iron, cobalt, nickel or rare-earth alloys like iron or cobalt with addition of neodymium or samarium in a jab, but in no way it could be a proof of presence of grapthene or graphene oxide.

Does it really matter what bullshit you stick to - that jabs are "safe and effective" or that jabs "have tons of graphene, 5G receivers, WiFi8 routers and bluetooth controlled laser nanomachines"?

I don't see any difference, really. It's all just ignorance and dnial of knowledge.

PS: does anybody know why exactly such hillarious failure like graphene had been choosen as scarecrow for idiots? No material on the Eart ever had such enormous expectations and marketing bullshit along with total absence of any real usefulness for over 150 years? And don't even try to talk about some Super-Absorbing Nanotecnology Vacuum Cleaner Exhaust Filter with Graphene Nanotubes Coating you bought online, which is really just cheap chineese paper filter slightly powdered with charcoal powder.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Burninator 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Make a no battery home radio, tune it to an AM band then listen to it with no power source to see how strong AM radio waves are with no amplification. (You should still be able to hear it just fine) Then you will realize how metal which resonates at specific frequencies is a bad idea to inject into your blood. Also remember AM Radio bands are on the weaker end of the radio spectrum and by law those radio towers have to be at the "Lowest wattage possible to complete the transmission".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– CrazyRussian 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Make a no battery home radio, tune it to an AM band then listen to it with no power source to see how strong AM radio waves are with no amplification. (You should still be able to hear it just fine)

Exactly. That is why idea of using ferromagnetic particle as simpliest possible long-wave receiver to work inside human body could be valid. Such receiver in correct place could create "voices in head". Some occasional proofs that it works was documented in history, f.e. when one subject got teeth stop containing metal powder as filler, he began to hear broadcasts from nearby AM station, received and demodulated by his teeth and then sneaked into nervous system. This created effect of "voices in head".

Also remember AM Radio bands are on the weaker end of the radio spectrum and by law those radio towers have to be at the "Lowest wattage possible to complete the transmission".

Not at all. long/mid-wave AM transmitters have to be very powerful to reach good coverage. Exactly because AM is at the weaker end of spectrum. To deliver noticeable energy to remote receiver you need a lot of power at transmitter. Check wattage of real AM stations of the past.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy