Digging into ways large businesses and corporations work it become clear to me that they are the only source of trotskist socialism today.
That's weird, because all that large businesses become so large only thanks to capitalism. And at the same time, it is capitalism was the only reason they turn to severe socialist entities, USSR could not dream about.
If you take a close look at any western large business, you inevitably find out that inside it is purely socialistic. With strict planning, complete absence of free trade, dogmatic leadership, some corporate rules and even ideology. Workers have to be absolute loyal to the ideological leadership of big business. Value that workers produce is distributed by leadership, useless jobs of those who does not create anything forcefully paid from money made by those who create real value and so on. Awful combination of extreme trotskizm ideologically and worst soviet socialist practices economically.
Corporations and big budinesses leadership have a lot of money in control - business money and their own. And they trying to change world around using their business internal structure as template. So they throw a lot of money to all that political socialists from WEF to LGBTXYZ++ and BLM activists in the hope they will reformat the world into well-known for them and fully controllabel by them structure, as they have in their large businesses.
Of course, globalists have their own, "reptiloid" agenda, but they are fully financed and rised to the top by big business with corporate socialism inside. In turn, globalists see this corporate socialism as ideal model for the NWO.
So, if you want to defeat NWO you have to completely destroy any socialism inside big businesses. Destroy any central planning, establish free trade between employer and employee, between branches and so on, eliminate any corporate ideology, prohibit any forcefull redistribution of wealth from real workers to useless stuff, no demands for loyalty to the top management and so on.
You can't have capitalism made from socialist entities. And if this socialist entities control most value adding in the country they will control overall political system. And will inevitably change it to the model they know and use.
Also, big business always want to destroy any small business in the county, because they see them not only as a prey and source of workforce for their corporate gulags, but also as ideological enemies, who show people that there could be another way to make business, and you don't necessary have to surrender your freedom, independece and free will to trotskist socialism in some corporation to earn for living.
Interesting, that in literature and even Hollywood products you could easily find examples of dystopian depiction of "corporate state" as they call it. But for "whatever" reason they never call it by its real name - "trotskist socialism". This is what big business use and produce. And this is what they try to establish over the world.
Prove me wrong. :)
large western corporations are held privately or publicly traded by shareholders, but not owned by the public or workers.
workers get recompensed for time but typically aren't shareholders.
profits are distributed unequally and exponentially up the corporate pyramid.
centralization of decision making process can still occur in either system, and it's sort of needed for most large endeavors to stay focused.
at this point many people realize a lot of large corporations produce only poison, and there is a market for smaller products that can meet the need of not being poisons (food, cleaning products, clothes, etc.).
Don't mix some idealistic textbook socialism with real world socialism. USSR enterprises was not owned by workers too. China enterprises also not owned by workers. You could barely find any really large enterprise who was owned by workers in any timespan of any socialism implementation existence.
And only tiny part of their time is really compensated.
Interesting, that larger enterprise have steeper curve. Despite there are no any logical (in terms of enterprise workflow) need for that.
Of course you need some planning just to be able to produce anything. But I'm talking not about technical planning, but about strategic planning. Some car manufacturer board of directors just decide that they should produce 20% of EVs this year. Just because they rhink so or believe in something. It is exactly like some soviet Gosplan decided that there should be produced 20% of yellow fabric on some textile enterprise. Then both could not sell that 20% to the customers for the set price. In case of western enterprise, additional money spent to convince customers to buy unneeded product by marketing or by damping price, in USSR this unneded fabric goes to industry where fabric color does not matter or in some warehouse. But in both cases top managemend will force enterprise to fulfill that based on nothing 20% plan and punish workers if their plan is not fulfilled.
And that's excellent. This prevent corporations from total monopolisation of the market. And that's why corporations through their cartels like WEF and other global shit trying to suppress small businesses with non-market measures.
Well, in USSR was also some place for tiny small businesses named "cooperatives". Mostly in food and clothes industry. It was businesses owned by workers, so it does not contradict socialism ideology. "Cooperative" prices was noticeably higher, but you could always buy quality products if you really needed to.