Is there any common way of looking up this technique. It's employed a lot and it's a type of subtle messaging and there are lots of generic ways of explaining it, but it's impossible to actually find these kinds of events anymore because they don't have a way of association between one another.

This technique is a 'priming' method that is used to prepare for something as you say. They use this a lot in news speak especially, and this carries through all the following downstream digestion reporting.

Then there is the naming convention used to 'overwrite' the collective consciousnesses previous association. We see this kind of thing happen with movies and their names being tied to old events, past atrocities, or in some cases conspiracies themselves and eventually you forget why it was named and you cannot find the old stuff anymore unless you have old records before the influx. Social media, and anything 'viral' does this primarily because it controls the volume and can then bury everything else not approved. They do this now through copyright, automated controls, and promote only that which is from 'trusted' sources.

Then there is also the 'rico' method which was perfected during trumps rein (TDS is a form of weaponized Rico death by association) and allows for the narrative to use an association and rebrand a term. For example - saying 'Make (my country) Great again' suddenly means you are associated with the latest 'scandal' in the news....

There is also another technique used heavily over the past few years and even on here. It's the 'barrage' method and it involves repeatedly posting true or false (doesn't matter) info again and again to annoy the audience through lack of novelty yet also breaking up discussion across so many threads that it dissolves the ability to be honest and deep.

And then there is the 'iceberg' which is a good way of muddying the waters by collecting everything common, a bunch of falsehoods, and a few truths of no consequence alongside a narrative to either dismiss the overall iceberg or to expand it beyond it's natural size because you only see "10% of what's really going on" --- ie... The red herring.

And of course there is the poisoned messenger. This one is common in anything that involves violence or depravity. Such as pedophiles. Essentially have a controlled but not yet arrested pedophile act like they are trying to stop pedophilia by having them run around their local area and then 'bust' the pedophile after they were caught 'trying to warn people about the dangers of it.' and this then poisons the well because it causes the false sense of cover through subterfuge and subconsciously associates the warnings with the pedophiles themselves. Meanwhile the actual operation is then protected under cover of this one individual

And there are probably many more techniques. Many are used by world leaders and you see the same thing from time to time, but you cannot quite spot the pattern right away. For example, the double speak is really really important. The ability for them to lie without lying is the main tactic they like to employ when being questioned so it's usually there or when they are announcing their plans that such double speak shows up.