Yes, plus one more piece. They will milk the shit out of their crappy AI. In fact the mor broken it is the better for their purposes.
They do not need a powerful AI, just a popular one which can take as much attention away from everything else.
It is literally the new insidious version of engagement control. They do not care about quality just that it gets wrapped around people's subconscious.
The AI is mostly tailored for simple ask and reply situations which rely on the built in assumption that any 'legimate' use of the AI will be seeking it's help and will naturally not possess the information which will be provided by the AI since the user would likely not ask. At the same time, things which people do commonly know can be accounted for and provide the most commonly expected answers for queries when some one 'does' know the answer.
Any time it cannot answer a complex question it will be explained away as either the 'prompt' was not smart enough....need to know how to ask what we do not for...you didn't say the magic word....please simp....
And the new hand wave is that....of course it is not yet AGI and we are in the 'fine tuning' stage and that the power comes from the intersection of private and public ..... In other words....those who have been tracking you are still valuable....in fact they are the only valuable companies....
Yes, plus one more piece. They will milk the shit out of their crappy AI. In fact the mor broken it is the better for their purposes.
They do not need a powerful AI, just a popular one which can take as much attention away from everything else.
It is literally the new insidious version of engagement control. They do not care about quality just that it gets wrapped around people's subconscious.
The AI is mostly tailored for simple ask and reply situations which rely on the built in assumption that any 'legimate' use of the AI will be seeking it's help and will naturally not possess the information which will be provided by the AI since the user would likely not ask. At the same time, things which people do commonly know can be accounted for and provide the most commonly expected answers for queries when some one 'does' know the answer.
Any time it cannot answer a complex question it will be explained away as either the 'prompt' was not smart enough....need to know how to ask what we do not for...you didn't say the magic word....please simp....
And the new hand wave is that....of course it is not yet AGI and we are in the 'fine tuning' stage and that the power comes from the intersection of private and public ..... In other words....those who have been tracking you are still valuable....in fact they are the only valuable companies....
Ads ....just ads....