I have no evidence to provide that you haven't seen. Nor have I claimed to.

However, others have provided more evidence, whether true or not, than you have for your argument.

That means that your theory is less plausible.

Applying occams razor, when two competing theories with equal evidence are presented, the simpler one is the one that should be assumed.

That means your theory is less realistic.

Don't argue logic when you don't know how, You should have left it at me giving you a 50/50 shot.

Or you can provide a shred of evidence that epstein is alive and well and settle the debate once and for all.