I think the reference above as that the poster invoked "the nazis" and the fake "neuremburg trials" to make a point about Ukraine. That foundation is mud, and so the structure in question (i.e. what is going on in Ukraine) is not stable or convincing ... or, the main point is debunked because of the faulty premises used.
Let's say: If A, then B
If I can prove A is bullshit, then what does that argument say about B? Answer: nothing. B still may or may not be true, but you're now out of the argument.
Why does believing Ukraine has nazis correlate with believing in the holocaust? The two are not mutually exclusive
It would still be as bad as the Japanese empire
I'd rather be a nazi or jap before a nigger so no
I think the reference above as that the poster invoked "the nazis" and the fake "neuremburg trials" to make a point about Ukraine. That foundation is mud, and so the structure in question (i.e. what is going on in Ukraine) is not stable or convincing ... or, the main point is debunked because of the faulty premises used.
Let's say: If A, then B
If I can prove A is bullshit, then what does that argument say about B? Answer: nothing. B still may or may not be true, but you're now out of the argument.
Perhaps OP can chime in, but this was my take.