Your source claimed it would be impossible to fill up the tanks as fast as they do. I demonstrated mathematically why that is incorrect. Multiple tanks explain the fill time “issue.”
I presented you with evidence that your source is wrong about the fill time conundrum. Instead of discussing, debating, or acknowledging my point, you just called me a name. Shame.
Shame?
Who uses shame??? Have you ever seen a fire hose??? It would destroy a plane from that sort of pressure.
That fact that you also try to use the word shame in all this makes you the kike Jew.
Did you ever feel the difference between driving a full engine water tank and an empty one and one in the middle?
Do you comprehend how much power it would take to life 300000 plus lbs(thats just the fuel weight?
That's what the butcher told my mom about the turkey.
But yeah. It's hard to estimate the volume of irregular curved objects, and wing thickness in the height direction is not really shown well by photos.
There can be tanks under the baggage compartment too. I once flew on a NASA CV-990 research plane formerly used for passengers commercially, and a guy pulled up the aisle carpeting to reveal a hatch. It opened to the baggage level, and we went down in-flight to fix a connector. He told me there was tank underneath us.
These are some of the dumbest arguments I've ever heard.
Dunning Kruger on full display.
Not even a video to go with your detailed rebuttal? How do you expect us commoners to understand your complexity??
Do you need a video to explain how not all pumps in the world operate at the same flow rate?
Or just a link that shows the fuel pumps can pump more liquid in a faster time than filling an Olympic pool.
No, no, psychopath. It’s on you to prove that planes don’t exist, you stupid fucking kike shill.
Is English a second language?
Is it yours?
Volume of total fuel. Volume of wings. It fits. Get over it.
That's 383000 lbs. You're still being serious??
A 747 holds 57,164 gallons of fuel.
Has 8 tanks.
7145.5 gallons per tank.
Takes 15 minutes to refuel in ideal circumstances.
That is 476 GMP.
A 2.5 in fire hose can pump 500 GMP.
Hey Google how much does a gallon of fuel weigh??? Lol, dumbass, need to borrow a calculator??
Your source claimed it would be impossible to fill up the tanks as fast as they do. I demonstrated mathematically why that is incorrect. Multiple tanks explain the fill time “issue.”
I presented you with evidence that your source is wrong about the fill time conundrum. Instead of discussing, debating, or acknowledging my point, you just called me a name. Shame.
Shame? Who uses shame??? Have you ever seen a fire hose??? It would destroy a plane from that sort of pressure. That fact that you also try to use the word shame in all this makes you the kike Jew.
I actually used to be a firefighter.
You seem to be confused about the psi in a 2.5” fire hose. The psi is only 250. It really is not all that damaging. The plane would be fine.
In the fire academy, a 2.5” hose slipped off the hydrant and sprayed me in the face… I did not lose my skin lol. It felt like a normal punch.
We do not need to rely on my anecdotal evidence, Youtube is full of examples of people getting sprayed with a 2.5” hose:
2.5” hose is used in crowd control (people get sprayed with it). There are several Jackass stunts where they get sprayed with a 2.5” hose.
So that is TWO things that are mathematically/ demonstrably incorrect about your “theory.”
Multiple tanks makes filling up faster. You incorrectly assumed there is only 1 fill port.
The psi in a 2.5” hose would NOT “destroy a plane.” You incorrectly assumed the psi is more damaging than it actually is.
Your theory has more holes than Swiss cheese.
Now it’s your turn. Please call me another name because you are not able to formulate a good counter argument.
In your great worldly travels and experiences have you ever seen the damage causes to a plane when a bird hits a plane?
What you call “worldly travels,” I call work.
If you wish to have an actual conversation on this topic, first address my two points. Why should I continue if you don't?
Did I provide enough evidence to prove that planes can logistically fill up faster than you thought because of multiple tanks?
Did I provide enough evidence to prove that human skin can withstand a direct spray from a 2.5” fire hose?
Did you ever feel the difference between driving a full engine water tank and an empty one and one in the middle? Do you comprehend how much power it would take to life 300000 plus lbs(thats just the fuel weight?
I have to assume there is storage besides wing tanks alone. Personally, I run my own jet on Jack Daniels for best mileage.
Everclear works better
hee hee. You Navy pilots.
The wings are quite larger than they look.
That's what the butcher told my mom about the turkey. But yeah. It's hard to estimate the volume of irregular curved objects, and wing thickness in the height direction is not really shown well by photos.
There can be tanks under the baggage compartment too. I once flew on a NASA CV-990 research plane formerly used for passengers commercially, and a guy pulled up the aisle carpeting to reveal a hatch. It opened to the baggage level, and we went down in-flight to fix a connector. He told me there was tank underneath us.