Any good resources that dive into Jesus being a Jew psyop? I watched Ceasar's Messiah that claimed it was Roman psyop to pacify the militaristic Jews. However, the creator, Joseph Atwill is a Jesuit, from a Jesuit Academy in Japan, and there's evidence he's from the intel community. Otherwise, it was an interesting documentary.
There is historical evidence about Jesus, the son of Panthera, a Roman Soldier.
If that was the case then the entire story given to us makes sense. A Gentile (Jesus, son of Panthera) goes into the synagogues preaching about Zeus/ Jupiter and the other GrecoRoman Gods as the real Gods and gets the rabbis mad AF. They end up getting him killed via political pressure (same old game). It makes sense why P. Pilatus was allegedly reluctant to do so.
This is the only way that story make sense.
Then Paul, a Jew who never met with the figure head Jesus (a historical entity as we said but not a son of God) as master puppeteer takes famous ancient world stories (e.g. Orpheus and Dionysus got crucified) synthesises them in a Hollywood style epic tale and serves them to the gentiles.
At the same time you had figures in the area like Apollonius of Tyana doing miracles with energy healing; Paul gets inspired and adds to the mythology.
Hail...Jesus the miracle God man is now in a cinema near you !
Jews use emotion and force and convert gentiles to early Christians; their origin is then forgotten. After that, classic human insecurity comes into play. No one is safe unless everyone is safe. So, the conversion by violence begins.
The Bible is written some centuries later by scholars. Same as the Talmud.
All non Jews who convert from polytheism/nature worshipping religions lose their identity. They are now ready to be subverted.
Interesting. I've never heard that angle before. I've mostly delved into how the Bible was constructed, by what people and for what political purpose. I found the heavy use of astrological references fascinating.
Exactly. You got the Hebraic mythology, then added Pagan rituals and beliefs (so it is accepted as nothing radically different by the then populus) and enriched with NeoPlatonic philosophy (which has connections with Hermetic philosophy) and you get the mish mash of what is called Christianity today.
And people today defend it fervently like its their own identity !!!
I generally agree with your premise that both sides are controlled, but I fail to understand how you think the anti vax crowd is being controlled / led?
Certainly there are a few personalities that are prominent like Steve kirsh and mcolough, but I wouldn't say they are leaders, they don't direct the movement, I feel like it's mostly headless, personal and these 'leaders' continue to provide data to back up the decision to be anti vax.
So you are saying as people lose faith in governments, they will turn to the leaders of the anti vaxx movement for guidance?
Which leaders / members do you believe are controlled, as generally I would say most of the current prominent names came up fairly organically and tended to lean anti establishment even if they are not explicitly so.
Ones consent to suggested money tempts one into a conflict of reason (rich vs poor)
Ones consent to suggested vaccine tempts one into a conflict of reason (vaxxed vs unvaxxed)
Ones consent to suggested words tempts one into a conflict of reason (truth vs lies)
Consenting to a suggested side (left or right) puts one into a conflict of reason (left vs right), while tempting one to ignore that ones consenting choice can only exist in-between left/right balance.
In short...consenting to any suggested side tempts ones choice off center, while permitting a chosen one control over both sides.
They control the entire checker board guys.
White (pure light) and black (absence of light)...neither can be perceived by one within the visible spectrum of light aka by a hue (color) man.
Others suggest black and white sides to distract hue-man from being spec (special; partial) within entire (whole). Only within spectrum can one perceive color, and only within light can there be a spectrum of color.
under the direction...
...distracts one from being (life) within direction (inception towards death). Neither over, nor under, but in-between aka IN (within) BE (being) TWEEN (two).
all wars...
...suggested by few represent the reasoning mind (want vs not want) of the consenting many.
The only difference between big mac vs whooper or ukraine vs russia is the branding of the sides...choosing either tempts one into the same conflict of reason. Take any conflict of reason (truth vs lie; good vs bad; us vs them etc.), then switch sides and notice that you're still within the same conflict.
Conflict cannot be resolved with reason for reason equals conflict.
Example...if two boxers go into one ring, then both are going to lose. They are tricked to fight about who spends more resistance into loss, while being deceived to view not losing as much as the other guy as growth.
Good, good, good...
And you know why they do it?
So you never discover that there is no virus and never has been one.
Because all the anti-vaxxers support the existence of a virus (but what killed muh granny).
Now take this knowledge and apply it to
Christians V. Satanists - Truth: there is no Jesus It was always a Jewish psyop to subvert the white population of their cultural identity
Far Right V. Far Left - Truth: Hitler was a Jew It was always a Jewish psyop to instigate the United nations (i.e. One World Government).
Do you understand how it works now?
Any good resources that dive into Jesus being a Jew psyop? I watched Ceasar's Messiah that claimed it was Roman psyop to pacify the militaristic Jews. However, the creator, Joseph Atwill is a Jesuit, from a Jesuit Academy in Japan, and there's evidence he's from the intel community. Otherwise, it was an interesting documentary.
Not so. It is more of an intuitive deduction.
There is historical evidence about Jesus, the son of Panthera, a Roman Soldier.
If that was the case then the entire story given to us makes sense. A Gentile (Jesus, son of Panthera) goes into the synagogues preaching about Zeus/ Jupiter and the other GrecoRoman Gods as the real Gods and gets the rabbis mad AF. They end up getting him killed via political pressure (same old game). It makes sense why P. Pilatus was allegedly reluctant to do so.
This is the only way that story make sense.
Then Paul, a Jew who never met with the figure head Jesus (a historical entity as we said but not a son of God) as master puppeteer takes famous ancient world stories (e.g. Orpheus and Dionysus got crucified) synthesises them in a Hollywood style epic tale and serves them to the gentiles.
At the same time you had figures in the area like Apollonius of Tyana doing miracles with energy healing; Paul gets inspired and adds to the mythology.
Hail...Jesus the miracle God man is now in a cinema near you !
Jews use emotion and force and convert gentiles to early Christians; their origin is then forgotten. After that, classic human insecurity comes into play. No one is safe unless everyone is safe. So, the conversion by violence begins.
The Bible is written some centuries later by scholars. Same as the Talmud.
All non Jews who convert from polytheism/nature worshipping religions lose their identity. They are now ready to be subverted.
The rest is history.
Interesting. I've never heard that angle before. I've mostly delved into how the Bible was constructed, by what people and for what political purpose. I found the heavy use of astrological references fascinating.
Judaism + Paganism + Hellenistic philosophy = Christianity.
Exactly. You got the Hebraic mythology, then added Pagan rituals and beliefs (so it is accepted as nothing radically different by the then populus) and enriched with NeoPlatonic philosophy (which has connections with Hermetic philosophy) and you get the mish mash of what is called Christianity today.
And people today defend it fervently like its their own identity !!!
I generally agree with your premise that both sides are controlled, but I fail to understand how you think the anti vax crowd is being controlled / led?
Certainly there are a few personalities that are prominent like Steve kirsh and mcolough, but I wouldn't say they are leaders, they don't direct the movement, I feel like it's mostly headless, personal and these 'leaders' continue to provide data to back up the decision to be anti vax.
Curious about your thoughts on this.
So you are saying as people lose faith in governments, they will turn to the leaders of the anti vaxx movement for guidance?
Which leaders / members do you believe are controlled, as generally I would say most of the current prominent names came up fairly organically and tended to lean anti establishment even if they are not explicitly so.
Ok, who do you expect will survive?
The Jews and their shabbos goys slaving away for the jobs AI cannot do.
Their Talmud says so.
But hopefully, there may be a turn.
I hope things turn too.
Ah yes I've heard this.
so we either comply or be exterminated?
What will it be fren?
Consenting to a suggested side (left or right) puts one into a conflict of reason (left vs right), while tempting one to ignore that ones consenting choice can only exist in-between left/right balance.
In short...consenting to any suggested side tempts ones choice off center, while permitting a chosen one control over both sides.
White (pure light) and black (absence of light)...neither can be perceived by one within the visible spectrum of light aka by a hue (color) man.
Others suggest black and white sides to distract hue-man from being spec (special; partial) within entire (whole). Only within spectrum can one perceive color, and only within light can there be a spectrum of color.
...distracts one from being (life) within direction (inception towards death). Neither over, nor under, but in-between aka IN (within) BE (being) TWEEN (two).
...suggested by few represent the reasoning mind (want vs not want) of the consenting many.
The only difference between big mac vs whooper or ukraine vs russia is the branding of the sides...choosing either tempts one into the same conflict of reason. Take any conflict of reason (truth vs lie; good vs bad; us vs them etc.), then switch sides and notice that you're still within the same conflict.
Conflict cannot be resolved with reason for reason equals conflict.
Example...if two boxers go into one ring, then both are going to lose. They are tricked to fight about who spends more resistance into loss, while being deceived to view not losing as much as the other guy as growth.